ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine2023
A robust protein language model for SARS-CoV-2 protein-protein interaction network prediction.
Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein Sequence Analysis landscape: A Systematic Review of Task Types, Databases, Datasets, Word Embeddings Methods, and Language Models.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Pooled it
- Neonatal sevoflurane exposure disrupts the lung-brain axis and drives microglial neuroinflammation and cognitive deficits.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Identification and mechanistic analysis of shared biomarkers and pathogenesis in acute pancreatitis and sepsis based on differential gene expression and protein interaction networks.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- Benchmark Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 Mutants' Immune Escape with 2B04 Murine Antibody: A Step Towards Unraveling a Larger Picture.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- MFPSP: Identification of fungal species-specific phosphorylation site using offspring competition-based genetic algorithm.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Dual-mechanism therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis via siRNA targeting of bacterial 16S rRNA and disruption of CFTR-pathogen interactions.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-protein interaction is one of the ways viruses interact with their hosts. Therefore, identifying protein interactions between viruses and hosts helps explain how virus proteins work, how they replicate, and how they cause disease. SARS-CoV-2 is a new type of virus that emerged from the coronavirus family in 2019 and caused a worldwide pandemic. Detection of human proteins interacting with this novel virus strain plays an important role in monitoring the cellular process of virus-associated infection. Within the scope of the study, a natural language processing-based collective learning method is proposed for the prediction of potential SARS-CoV-2-human PPIs. Protein language models were obtained with the prediction-based word2Vec and doc2Vec embedding methods and the frequency-based tf-idf method. Known interactions were represented by proposed language models and traditional feature extraction methods (conjoint triad and repeat pattern), and their performances were compared. The interaction data were trained with support vector machine, artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), naive Bayes (NB), decision tree (DT), and ensemble algorithms. Experimental results show that protein language models are a promising protein representation method for protein-protein interaction prediction. The term frequency-inverse document frequency-based language model performed the SARS-CoV-2 protein-protein interaction estimation with an error of 1.4%. Additionally, the decisions of high-performing learning models for different feature extraction methods were combined with a collective voting approach to make new interaction predictions. For 10,000 human proteins, 285 new potential interactions were predicted, with models combining decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.