ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine2023
Impact of loss functions on the performance of a deep neural network designed to restore low-dose digital mammography.
Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinically Aware Learning: Ordinal Loss Improves Medical Image Classifiers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the impact of image restoration in simulating higher dose mammography: effects on the detectability of microcalcifications across different sizes using model observer analysis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- U-Net-Based Prediction of Cerebrospinal Fluid Distribution and Ventricular Reflux Grading.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Task-based assessment of digital mammography microcalcification detection with deep learning denoising algorithmss usingJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Digital mammography is currently the most common imaging tool for breast cancer screening. Although the benefits of using digital mammography for cancer screening outweigh the risks associated with the x-ray exposure, the radiation dose must be kept as low as possible while maintaining the diagnostic utility of the generated images, thus minimizing patient risks. Many studies investigated the feasibility of dose reduction by restoring low-dose images using deep neural networks. In these cases, choosing the appropriate training database and loss function is crucial and impacts the quality of the results. In this work, we used a standard residual network (ResNet) to restore low-dose digital mammography images and evaluated the performance of several loss functions. For training purposes, we extracted 256,000 image patches from a dataset of 400 images of retrospective clinical mammography exams, where dose reduction factors of 75% and 50% were simulated to generate low and standard-dose pairs. We validated the network in a real scenario by using a physical anthropomorphic breast phantom to acquire real low-dose and standard full-dose images in a commercially available mammography system, which were then processed through our trained model. We benchmarked our results against an analytical restoration model for low-dose digital mammography. Objective assessment was performed through the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the mean normalized squared error (MNSE), decomposed into residual noise and bias. Statistical tests revealed that the use of the perceptual loss (PL4) resulted in statistically significant differences when compared to all other loss functions. Additionally, images restored using the PL4 achieved the closest residual noise to the standard dose. On the other hand, perceptual loss PL3, structural similarity index (SSIM) and one of the adversarial losses achieved the lowest bias for both dose reduction factors. The source code of our deep neural network is available at https://github.com/WANG-AXIS/LdDMDenoising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.