ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2023
AxonQuantifier: A semi-automated program for quantifying axonal density from whole-mounted optic nerves.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- AxoMetric platform facilitates rapid and unbiased automated quantification of axon regeneration in tissue sections.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Electric field stimulation directs target-specific axon regeneration and partial restoration of vision after optic nerve crush injury.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHere, we present a semi-automated method for quantifying retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon density at different distances from the optic nerve crush site using longitudinal, confocal microscopy images taken from whole-mounted optic nerves. This method employs the algorithm AxonQuantifier which operates on the freely available program, ImageJ. NEW
methodTo validate this method, seven adult male Long Evans rats underwent optic nerve crush injury followed by in vivo treatment with electric fields of varying strengths for 30 days to produce optic nerves with a wide range of axon densities distal to the optic nerve crush site. Prior to euthanasia, RGC axons were labelled with intravitreal injections of cholera toxin B conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647. After dissection, optic nerves underwent tissue clearing, were whole-mounted, and imaged longitudinally using confocal microscopy. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
methodsFive masked raters quantified RGC axon density at 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1250, 1500, 1750, and 2000 µm distances past the optic nerve crush site for the seven optic nerves manually and using AxonQuantifier. Agreement between these methods was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and linear regression. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using the intra-class coefficient.
resultsSemi-automated quantification of RGC axon density demonstrated improved inter-rater agreement and reduced bias values as compared to manual quantification, while also increasing time efficiency 4-fold. Relative to manual quantification, AxonQuantifier tended to underestimate axon density.
conclusionsAxonQuantifier is a reliable and efficient method for quantifying axon density from whole mount optic nerves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.