Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37315139›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Neuronal responses to omitted tones in the auditory brain: A neuronal correlate for predictive coding.

Ana B Lao-Rodríguez, Karol Przewrocki, David Pérez-González, Artoghrul Alishbayli, Evrim Yilmaz, Manuel S Malmierca, Bernhard Englitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Signaling of salience and prediction errors by anterior insula neurons.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Somatosensory Mismatch Negativity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana B Lao-RodríguezCognitive and Auditory Neuroscience Laboratory (CANELAB), Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4093-0160
Karol PrzewrockiComputational Neuroscience Lab, Department of Neurophysiology, Donders Centre of Neuroscience, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7181-1797
David Pérez-GonzálezCognitive and Auditory Neuroscience Laboratory (CANELAB), Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6288-2692
Artoghrul AlishbayliComputational Neuroscience Lab, Department of Neurophysiology, Donders Centre of Neuroscience, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Evrim YilmazComputational Neuroscience Lab, Department of Neurophysiology, Donders Centre of Neuroscience, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2653-5727
Manuel S MalmiercaCognitive and Auditory Neuroscience Laboratory (CANELAB), Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0168-7572
Bernhard EnglitzComputational Neuroscience Lab, Department of Neurophysiology, Donders Centre of Neuroscience, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9106-0356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction provides key advantages for survival, and cognitive studies have demonstrated that the brain computes multilevel predictions. Evidence for predictions remains elusive at the neuronal level because of the complexity of separating neural activity into predictions and stimulus responses. We overcome this challenge by recording from single neurons from cortical and subcortical auditory regions in anesthetized and awake preparations, during unexpected stimulus omissions interspersed in a regular sequence of tones. We find a subset of neurons that responds reliably to omitted tones. In awake animals, omission responses are similar to anesthetized animals, but larger and more frequent, indicating that the arousal and attentional state levels affect the degree to which predictions are neuronally represented. Omission-sensitive neurons also responded to frequency deviants, with their omission responses getting emphasized in the awake state. Because omission responses occur in the absence of sensory input, they provide solid and empirical evidence for the implementation of a predictive process.

Indexed as

BrainNeuronsAnimalsArousal

Identifiers

PMID37315139
PMCPMC10266733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.