Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37315078›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2023

The experiences and needs of unpaid family caregivers for persons living with dementia in rural settings: A qualitative systematic review.

Heather J Campbell-Enns, Stephen Bornstein, Veronica M M Hutchings, Maya Janzen, Melanie Kampen, Kelli O'Brien, Kendra L Rieger, Tara Stewart, Benjamin Rich Zendel, Malcolm B Doupe

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Heather J Campbell-EnnsDepartment of Psychology, Canadian Mennonite University, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9920-5254
Stephen BornsteinDepartment of Political Science, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Veronica M M HutchingsAging Research Centre-NL, Grenfell Campus, Memorial University, Corner Brook, Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, Canada.
Maya JanzenSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Melanie KampenCentre for Transnational Mennonite Studies, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Kelli O'BrienSt. Joseph's Care Group, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Kendra L RiegerSchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, British Columbia, Canada.
Tara StewartDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Benjamin Rich ZendelFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Malcolm B DoupeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CACanadian Mennonite University · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CACarleton University · CASt. Joseph's Care Group · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR 163082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnpaid family caregivers provide extensive support for community-dwelling persons living with dementia, impacting family caregivers' health and wellbeing. Further, unpaid family caregiving in rural settings has additional challenges because of lower access to services. This systematic review examines qualitative evidence to summarize the experiences and needs of rural unpaid family caregivers of persons living with dementia.

methodsCINAHL, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsychINFO, ProQuest, and Medline were searched for articles investigating the experience and needs of rural family caregivers of persons living with dementia. Eligibility criteria were: 1) original qualitative research; 2) written in the English language; 3) focused on the perspectives of caregivers of community-dwelling persons with dementia; 4) focused on rural settings. Study findings were extracted from each article and a meta-aggregate process was used to synthesize the findings.

findingsOf the 510 articles screened, 36 studies were included in this review. Studies were of moderate to high quality and produced 245 findings that were analyzed to produce three synthesized findings: 1) the challenge of dementia care; 2) rural limitations; 3) rural opportunities.

conclusionsRurality is perceived as a limitation for family caregivers in relation to the scope of services provided but can be perceived as a benefit when caregivers experience trustworthy and helpful social networks in rural settings. Implications for practice include establishing and empowering community groups to partner in the provision of care. Further research must be conducted to better understand the strengths and limitations of rurality on caregiving.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaEligibility DeterminationFamily HealthHumansIndependent Living

Identifiers

PMID37315078
PMCPMC10266592
OpenAlexW4380591227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.