ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
Recall DNA methylation levels at low coverage sites using a CNN model in WGBS.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- cyberDMR: accurate and robust identification of differentially methylated regions from WGS-derived methylomes.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Genome-wide extraction of differentially methylated DNA regions using adapter-anchored proximity primers.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- PCBert-Kla: an efficient prediction method for lysine lactylation sites based on ProtBert and fusion of physicochemical features.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- cfMethylPre: deep transfer learning enhances cancer detection based on circulating cell-free DNA methylation profiling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- PMPred-AE: a computational model for the detection and interpretation of pathological myopia based on artificial intelligence.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A multi-organization epigenetic age prediction based on a channel attention perceptron networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Time series-based hybrid ensemble learning model with multivariate multidimensional feature coding for DNA methylation prediction.BMC genomics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA methylation is an important regulator of gene transcription. WGBS is the gold-standard approach for base-pair resolution quantitative of DNA methylation. It requires high sequencing depth. Many CpG sites with insufficient coverage in the WGBS data, resulting in inaccurate DNA methylation levels of individual sites. Many state-of-arts computation methods were proposed to predict the missing value. However, many methods required either other omics datasets or other cross-sample data. And most of them only predicted the state of DNA methylation. In this study, we proposed the RcWGBS, which can impute the missing (or low coverage) values from the DNA methylation levels on the adjacent sides. Deep learning techniques were employed for the accurate prediction. The WGBS datasets of H1-hESC and GM12878 were down-sampled. The average difference between the DNA methylation level at 12× depth predicted by RcWGBS and that at >50× depth in the H1-hESC and GM2878 cells are less than 0.03 and 0.01, respectively. RcWGBS performed better than METHimpute even though the sequencing depth was as low as 12×. Our work would help to process methylation data of low sequencing depth. It is beneficial for researchers to save sequencing costs and improve data utilization through computational methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.