Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37314645›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023

CDK4/6 Inhibition in the Metastatic Setting: Where Are We Headed?

Elizabeth Sakach, Merve Keskinkilic, Sarah Wood, Madison Canning, Kevin Kalinsky

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth SakachWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. esakach@emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3295-0612
Merve KeskinkilicDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey.
Sarah WoodWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Madison CanningWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Kevin KalinskyWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementHormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER-2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is the most common subtype of breast cancer. Due to therapeutic advances with molecularly targeted therapies, the prognosis for patients with metastatic disease has improved significantly. The advent of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) has changed the treatment paradigm for patients with HR+HER2-MBC. CDK4/6i allowed for marked improvement in overall survival, delaying the time to chemotherapy initiation, and improved quality of life for our patients. Efforts are now focused on the best approach(es) for patients after progression on CDK4/6i. Can we further harness the benefit of CDK4/6i in novel combinations at the time of progression? Should we continue CDK4/6i or proceed other novel agents or endocrine therapies? As we advance our treatment strategies for HR+HER2-MBC, there is no longer a one-size-fits-all model, but instead a multifaceted and personalized approach lending to improved outcomes for our patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyOncogenesQuality of LifeCDK4 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesCDK4/6 inhibitorEndocrine resistance, ctDNAHormone therapyMetastatic breast cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.