Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37314611›Full record

SynthesisCurrent urology reports2023

Role, Cost, and Availably of Urinary pH Monitoring for Kidney Stone Disease-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Isabel Sanz-Gómez, Oriol Angerri, Michael Baboudjian, Andrés Kanashiro, Sílvia Gracia, Félix Millán, Francisco Sánchez-Martín, Bhaskar Somani, Juan Antonio Galan-Llopis, Yazeed Barghouthy and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current urology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Isabel Sanz-GómezDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. isa.sanzgomez@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4306-7710
Oriol AngerriDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Michael BaboudjianDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Andrés KanashiroDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Sílvia GraciaDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Félix MillánDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco Sánchez-MartínDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Bhaskar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Juan Antonio Galan-LlopisDepartment of Urology, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.
Yazeed BarghouthyDepartment of Urology, CH Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France.
Esteban EmilianiDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESCentre Hospitalier de Valenciennes · FRHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewUrinary pH is an important factor related to renal stone disease, and it plays an essential role in stone prevention. Monitoring of urinary pH by patients at home provides information that can help to assess the treatment needed by each patient. We conducted a systematic review is to assess the available evidence concerning urinary pH monitoring methods along with their accuracy, cost, and usefulness by patients with urolithiasis. RECENT

findingsA total of 9 articles were included (1886 urinary pH measurements). They reported information about urinary dipsticks, portable electronic pH meters and electronic strip readers, amongst other methods. Accuracy was compared with a laboratory pH meter (gold standard). Urinary dipsticks were found to be not accurate enough to guide clinical decision making and portable electronic pH meters showed promising results. Urinary dipsticks are neither precise nor accurate enough. Portable electronic pH meters seem to be more accurate, easy to use, and cost-effective. They are a reliable source for patients to use at home in order to prevent future episodes of nephrolithiasis.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiUrinary TractUrolithiasisForecastingHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationKidney calculiMonitoringPCNLStone preventionUreteroscopyUrine pH

Identifiers

PMID37314611
OpenAlexW4380576742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.