Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37314592›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Clinical factors of PICC-RVT in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Shengmiao Ma, Chen Shen, Qiuyue Li, Haojie Yang, Yule Hu, Xiaolei Wei, Tao Liang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Comprehensive Review of Catheter-Related Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shengmiao MaSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.9 Dong Dan San Tiao, Beijing, 100730, China.
Chen ShenSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.9 Dong Dan San Tiao, Beijing, 100730, China.
Qiuyue LiSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.9 Dong Dan San Tiao, Beijing, 100730, China.
Haojie YangSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.9 Dong Dan San Tiao, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yule HuSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.9 Dong Dan San Tiao, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xiaolei WeiSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.9 Dong Dan San Tiao, Beijing, 100730, China.
Tao LiangSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.9 Dong Dan San Tiao, Beijing, 100730, China. liangtao1@hotmail.com.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is a lack of studies that systematically evaluate the clinical factors of PICC-RVT such as treatment, tumor stage, metastasis, and chemotherapy drugs in cancer patients. This study, therefore, aims to evaluate the clinical factors of catheter-related venous thrombosis in cancer patients with indwelling PICC to provide a basis for the clinical prevention and reduction of thrombosis.

methodsRelevant studies were retrieved from major databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Data, and China Biology Medicine disc (CMB)) and searched from their earliest available dates until July 2022. If two or more studies had the same outcome, a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4.1 was performed. This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (number CRD42022358426).

resultsA total of 19 articles involving 19,824 patients were included for quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis of these studies indicated that a history of chemotherapy, tumor type, tumor stage, presence or absence of metastasis, and use of fluorouracil, etoposide, platinum drugs, and taxane were all risk factors for PICC catheter thrombosis in cancer patients.

conclusionIn clinical PICC catheter thrombosis prevention, patients with the above characteristics should be watched more closely than other patients, as they have a higher risk for PICC catheter thrombosis. Based on the present evidence at hand, radiotherapy cannot be considered to be related to the formation of PICC-RVT in cancer patients.

Indexed as

CathetersNeoplasmsChinaDatabases, FactualEtoposideHumansEtoposideClinical factorsMeta-analysisNeoplasmsPeripherally inserted central catheterVenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID37314592
OpenAlexW4380576718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.