Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37314469›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Trends and statistics of artificial intelligence and radiomics research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Medical Imaging: bibliometric analysis.

Burak Kocak, Bettina Baessler, Renato Cuocolo, Nathaniel Mercaldo, Daniel Pinto Dos Santos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Lexomics, or why to extract relevant information from radiology reports through LLMs.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Insights into radiomics: a comprehensive review for beginners.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Development and validation of a radiomics model using plain radiographs to predict spine fractures with posterior wall injury.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Burak KocakDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Basaksehir, Istanbul, 34480, Turkey. drburakkocak@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7307-396X
Bettina BaesslerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3244-3864
Renato CuocoloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-1574
Nathaniel MercaldoDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1658-6598
Daniel Pinto Dos SantosDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4785-6394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) and its subfields as well as radiomics in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Medical Imaging (RNMMI).

methodsWeb of Science was queried for relevant publications in RNMMI and medicine along with their associated data from 2000 to 2021. Bibliometric techniques utilised were co-occurrence, co-authorship, citation burst, and thematic evolution analyses. Growth rate and doubling time were also estimated using log-linear regression analyses.

resultsAccording to the number of publications, RNMMI (11,209; 19.8%) was the most prominent category in medicine (56,734). USA (44.6%) and China (23.1%) were the two most productive and collaborative countries. USA and Germany experienced the strongest citation bursts. Thematic evolution has recently exhibited a significant shift toward deep learning. In all analyses, the annual number of publications and citations demonstrated exponential growth, with deep learning-based publications exhibiting the most prominent growth pattern. Estimated continuous growth rate, annual growth rate, and doubling time of the AI and machine learning publications in RNMMI were 26.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.0-40.2%), 29.8% (95% CI, 12.7-49.5%), and 2.7 years (95% CI, 1.7-5.8), respectively. In the sensitivity analysis using data from the last 5 and 10 years, these estimates ranged from 47.6 to 51.1%, 61.0 to 66.7%, and 1.4 to 1.5 years.

conclusionThis study provides an overview of AI and radiomics research conducted mainly in RNMMI. These results may assist researchers, practitioners, policymakers, and organisations in gaining a better understanding of both the evolution of these fields and the importance of supporting (e.g., financial) these research activities. KEY POINTS: • In terms of the number of publications on AI and ML, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Medical Imaging was the most prominent category compared to the other categories related to medicine (e.g., Health Policy & Services, Surgery). • All evaluated analyses (i.e., AI, its subfields, and radiomics), based on the annual number of publications and citations, demonstrated exponential growth, with decreasing doubling time, which indicates increasing interest from researchers, journals, and, in turn, the medical imaging community. • The most prominent growth pattern was observed in deep learning-based publications. However, the further thematic analysis demonstrated that deep learning has been underdeveloped but highly relevant to the medical imaging community.

Indexed as

Nuclear MedicineArtificial IntelligenceBibliometricsHumansRadiographyRadionuclide ImagingArtificial intelligenceBibliometricsDeep learningMachine learningRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.