Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37314190›Full record

ArticleProteins2023

Estimation of model accuracy in CASP15 using the ModFOLDdock server.

Nicholas S Edmunds, Shuaa M A Alharbi, Ahmet G Genc, Recep Adiyaman, Liam J McGuffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessing scoring metrics for AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 protein complex predictions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recent advances and challenges in protein complex model accuracy estimation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Petabase-Scale Homology Search for Structure Prediction.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Protein structure accuracy estimation using geometry-complete perceptron networks.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Petascale Homology Search for Structure Prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas S EdmundsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7238-6008
Shuaa M A AlharbiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Ahmet G GencSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Recep AdiyamanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Liam J McGuffinSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4501-4767

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In CASP15, there was a greater emphasis on multimeric modeling than in previous experiments, with assembly structures nearly doubling in number (41 up from 22) since the previous round. CASP15 also included a new estimation of model accuracy (EMA) category in recognition of the importance of objective quality assessment (QA) for quaternary structure models. ModFOLDdock is a multimeric model QA server developed by the McGuffin group at the University of Reading, which brings together a range of single-model, clustering, and deep learning methods to form a consensus of approaches. For CASP15, three variants of ModFOLDdock were developed to optimize for the different facets of the quality estimation problem. The standard ModFOLDdock variant produced predicted scores optimized for positive linear correlations with the observed scores. The ModFOLDdockR variant produced predicted scores optimized for ranking, that is, the top-ranked models have the highest accuracy. In addition, the ModFOLDdockS variant used a quasi-single model approach to score each model on an individual basis. The scores from all three variants achieved strongly positive Pearson correlation coefficients with the CASP observed scores (oligo-lDDT) in excess of 0.70, which were maintained across both homomeric and heteromeric model populations. In addition, at least one of the ModFOLDdock variants was consistently ranked in the top two methods across all three EMA categories. Specifically, for overall global fold prediction accuracy, ModFOLDdock placed second and ModFOLDdockR placed third; for overall interface quality prediction accuracy, ModFOLDdockR, ModFOLDdock, and ModFOLDdockS were placed above all other predictor methods, and ModFOLDdockR and ModFOLDdockS were placed second and third respectively for individual residue confidence scores. The ModFOLDdock server is available at: https://www.reading.ac.uk/bioinf/ModFOLDdock/. ModFOLDdock is also available as part of the MultiFOLD docker package: https://hub.docker.com/r/mcguffin/multifold.

Indexed as

ProteinsSoftwareComputational BiologyModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteins3D modelingEMAestimates of model accuracymodel quality assessmentprotein structure predictionQAquaternary structure

Identifiers

PMID37314190
PMCPMC10952711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.