Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37314016›Full record

ArticleClinical science (London, England : 1979)2023

Cancer and sepsis.

Jeroson C Williams, Mandy L Ford, Craig M Coopersmith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Cancer Patients With Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessment of Phoenix sepsis score: characterization of a cohort of children of different primary statuses and ages, 2020-2024.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeroson C WilliamsDepartment of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, U.S.A.
Mandy L FordDepartment of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, U.S.A.
Craig M CoopersmithDepartment of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-2400-3217
Emory University · US

Funding

Critical Care Training ProgramT32GM095442 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Craig M Coopersmith · 2011 to 2026
$4.7M
The Impact of Cancer on the Pathophysiology of SepsisR01GM104323 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COOPERSMITH, CRAIG M, FORD, MANDY L · 2013 to 2021
$2.4M
The Gut as a Target to Improve Outcomes in SepsisR35GM148217 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Craig M Coopersmith · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Memory T Cell Cosigning Pathways in Sepsis-Induced Immune DysregulationR01AI149724 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, MANDY L · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI149724NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104323NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148217NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM095442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. While mortality is high regardless of inciting infection or comorbidities, mortality in patients with cancer and sepsis is significantly higher than mortality in patients with sepsis without cancer. Cancer patients are also significantly more likely to develop sepsis than the general population. The mechanisms underlying increased mortality in cancer and sepsis patients are multifactorial. Cancer treatment alters the host immune response and can increase susceptibility to infection. Preclinical data also suggests that cancer, in and of itself, increases mortality from sepsis with dysregulation of the adaptive immune system playing a key role. Further, preclinical data demonstrate that sepsis can alter subsequent tumor growth while tumoral immunity impacts survival from sepsis. Checkpoint inhibition is a well-accepted treatment for many types of cancer, and there is increasing evidence suggesting this may be a useful strategy in sepsis as well. However, preclinical studies of checkpoint inhibition in cancer and sepsis demonstrate results that could not have been predicted by examining either variable in isolation. As sepsis management transitions from a 'one size fits all' model to a more individualized approach, understanding the mechanistic impact of cancer on outcomes from sepsis represents an important strategy towards delivering on the promise of precision medicine in the intensive care unit.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSepsisHumansPrecision MedicineCancerCritical CareGutIntensive CareSepsisT cell

Identifiers

PMID37314016
PMCPMC10635282
OpenAlexW4380577741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.