Observational studySaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
Exploring treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with infliximab in the Middle East and Northern Africa: An analysis of the HARIR observational cohort study.
Observational study in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03006198 (Tracking Biologics Along the Silk Road), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Tracking Biologics Along the Silk Road
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utilisation and real-world effectiveness of advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease in Middle Eastern populations: a systematic review.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients managed with lower endoscopy: A tertiary center results.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In 2017, inflammatory bowel disease, including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) affected more than 6.8 million people worldwide, with increased incidence in newly industrialized countries. Although treatment options were previously limited to symptom reduction, current approaches benefit from disease-modifying biologics. In this study, we aimed to explore disease characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients with CD or UC treated with infliximab or golimumab in routine clinical practice in the Middle East and Northern Africa. Methods: HARIR was a prospective, observational, multicenter study (NCT03006198), in patients who were treatment naïve or who received two or fewer biologic agents. Observed data from routine clinical practice were presented descriptively. Results: Data from 86 patients enrolled from five countries (Algeria, Egypt, Kuwait, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia) were analyzed, 62 with CD and 24 with UC. All patients received infliximab. Clinically meaningful efficacy data were observed only for the CD group (up to Month 3) due to limited patient numbers. Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores at Month 3 indicated a positive response to treatment (reduced score of ≥70 and ≥25% compared with baseline) for 14/48 (29.2%) patients; notably, 28/52 (53.8%) patients had CDAI score <150 at baseline. Rates of serious and severe adverse events (AEs) were low in both groups. The most common AEs were gastrointestinal disorders. Conclusion: Infliximab treatment was well tolerated in this Middle Eastern and Northern African population, and a clinical response was observed for 29.2% of CD patients. Limited accessibility to biologics and concomitant treatments restricted study conduct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.