Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37313386›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and translational science2023

Guidance on selecting a translational framework for intervention development: Optimizing interventions for impact.

Kate Guastaferro, Angela F Pfammatter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07609342 (Optimizing a School-Based Therapeutic Play Intervention for Preschool Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07609342 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Optimizing a School-Based Therapeutic Play Intervention for Preschool Students: A Factorial Experiment Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Children's InstituteRan2024 to 2027Enrolled225ConditionsSocioemotional DevelopmentArmsIndividual play sessions, Peer play sessions, Classroom push-in sessions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Twenty years of intervention optimization.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kate GuastaferroDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5616-9708
Angela F PfammatterCollege of Education, Health, and Human Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.

Funding

Evaluating the EVO treatment optimized for resource constraints: Elements Vital to treat ObesityR01DK125749 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI PFAMMATTER, ANGELA FIDLER · 2020 to 2025
$2.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK125749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intervention development frameworks offer the behavioral sciences a systematic and rigorous empirical process to guide the translation of basic science into practice in pursuit of desirable public health and clinical outcomes. The multiple frameworks that have emerged share a goal of optimization during intervention development and can increase the likelihood of arriving at an effective and disseminable intervention. Yet, the process of optimizing an intervention differs functionally and conceptually across frameworks, creating confusion and conflicting guidance on when and how to optimize. This paper seeks to facilitate the use of translational intervention development frameworks by providing a blueprint for selecting and using a framework by considering the process of optimization as conceptualized by each. First, we operationalize optimization and contextualize its role in intervention development. Next, we provide brief overviews of three translational intervention development frameworks (ORBIT, MRC, and MOST), identifying areas of overlap and divergence thereby aligning core concepts across the frameworks to improve translation. We offer considerations and concrete use cases for investigators seeking to identify and use a framework in their intervention development research. We push forward an agenda of a norm to use and specify frameworks in behavioral science to support a more rapid translational pipeline.

Indexed as

behavior changeintervention developmentMOSTMRCOptimizationORBIT

Identifiers

PMID37313386
PMCPMC10260336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.