Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37313361›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2023

Research Letter-Outcomes of Outpatient Native Kidney Biopsies at the McGill University Health Center: A Quality Assurance Audit.

Amy Qi, Matin Kerachian, Ratna Samanta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy QiUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Matin KerachianMcGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Ratna SamantaMcGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3014-7316

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous kidney biopsies are essential for diagnosis and management of kidney diseases. However, post-procedural bleeding is a significant risk associated with biopsies. At the McGill University Health Center, the 2 main hospitals, the Royal Victoria Hospital and the Montreal General Hospital, have different observation protocols for outpatient native kidney biopsies. Currently, patients are admitted for a 24-hour inpatient observation at the Montreal General Hospital, whereas patients biopsied at the Royal Victoria Hospital are discharged after 6 to 8 hours of observation at the end of the day. Most Canadian centers do not admit patients for an overnight observation, and it was unclear why this practice continued at the Montreal General Hospital. Objective: Our objective was to determine the incidence of complications post-renal biopsy over the past 5 years at both hospital sites, and compare them to each other, as well as to established rates in the available literature. Design: This assessment was designed as a quality assurance audit. Setting: This audit was conducted from a local registry of renal biopsies performed at the McGill University Health Center between January 2015 to January 2020. Patients: We included all adult patients (between the ages 18 and 80) with outpatient native kidney biopsies performed at the McGill University Health Center between 2015 and 2020. Measurements: We collected the included patients' baseline demographics and risk factors at the time of biopsy, including age, BMI, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, pre- and post-biopsy hemoglobin, platelet, urea, coagulation profile, blood pressure, kidney side/size as well as needle size, and number of passes made. Methods: We compared the incidence of both minor and major bleeding complications at the Montreal General and the Royal Victoria Hospital. Variables that were measured included hemoglobin before and after biopsy, incidence of minor bleeding complications (defined by hematomas and gross hematuria), and incidence of major complications (defined by post-biopsy bleeding requiring either transfusions or another procedure to stop the bleeding), as well as the incidence of admissions post-biopsy. Results: The incidence of major complications was 2.87% over 5 years (5/174 patients), which is comparable with that reported in the literature. Our transfusion incidence was 1.72% (3/174 patients) and our embolization incidence was 2.3% (4/174 patients) over the 5 study years. Our total number of major events was low and the patients who had major events had significant risk factors for bleeding. All events occurred within 6 hours of observation. Limitations: This was a retrospective study with a low event number. Additionally, since the events included only those recorded at the McGill University Health Center, it is possible that the events of interest may have occurred at other hospital sites without the author's knowledge. Conclusions: Based on the results of this audit, all major bleeding events occurred within 6 hours of a percutaneous kidney biopsy, suggesting that patients should be monitored for 6 to 8 hours following biopsy. The next step after this quality assurance audit is a quality improvement project and a cost-effectiveness analysis to assess whether post-biopsy practices should be amended at the McGill University Health Center.

Indexed as

bleeding riskcomplicationkidney biopsyobservation periodquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID37313361
PMCPMC10259123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.