Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37313266›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2023

Effect of propofol on salivary secretion from the submandibular, sublingual, and labial glands during intravenous sedation.

Keisuke Masuda, Akira Furuyama, Kenji Ohsuga, Shota Abe, Hiroyoshi Kawaai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keisuke MasudaDepartment of Oral Function and Molecular Biology, Ohu University School of Dentistry, Fukushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7005-5117
Akira FuruyamaDepartment of Oral Function and Molecular Biology, Ohu University School of Dentistry, Fukushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9657-6367
Kenji OhsugaDepartment of Oral Function and Molecular Biology, Ohu University School of Dentistry, Fukushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3117-9758
Shota AbeDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Ohu University School of Dentistry, Fukushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4597-3327
Hiroyoshi KawaaiDepartment of Oral Function and Molecular Biology, Ohu University School of Dentistry, Fukushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-0550

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recent animal studies have suggested the role of GABA type A (GABA- Methods: Twenty healthy male volunteers participated in the study. They received a loading dose of propofol 6 mg/kg/h for 10 min, followed by 3 mg/kg/h for 15 min. Salivary flow rates in the submandibular, sublingual, and labial glands were measured before, during, and after propofol infusion, and amylase activity was measured in the saliva from the submandibular and sublingual glands. Results: We found that the salivary flow rates in the submandibular, sublingual, and labial glands significantly decreased during intravenous sedation with propofol (P < 0.01). Similarly, amylase activity in the saliva from the submandibular and sublingual glands was significantly decreased (P < 0.01). Conclusion: It can be concluded that intravenous sedation with propofol decreases salivary secretion in the submandibular, sublingual, and labial glands via the GABA-

Indexed as

AmylasesGABA-A ReceptorIntravenous InjectionsPropofolSalivary Flow RateSedation

Identifiers

PMID37313266
PMCPMC10260352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.