ReviewArchives of medical science : AMS2023
Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure compared to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Review in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bleeding Disorder, A Newly Recognized Adverse Event Following Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative clinical outcomes and safety of finerenone, SGLT2 inhibitors, RAS inhibitors and ARNI in heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Inflammasomes as Potential Therapeutic Targets to Prevent Chronic Active Viral Myocarditis-Translating Basic Science into Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Protective effect of valsartan alone and in combination with neprilysin inhibitor (valsartan + sacubitril) against hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury: targeting angiotensin II receptor-neprilysin and modulating SMAD-4/NF-κβ/JNK pathways in rats.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Growth Differentiation Factor 15 is Correlated With Urinary Markers in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Atherosclerotic features in patients with heart failure.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Summary of 2023 and the biggest challenges for the "Archives of Medical Science" on its 20Archives of medical science : AMS · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is still a major cause of morbidity and mortality all over the world. Aim of the study was to assess the benefits and harms of sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in patients with HF. Material and methods: We systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating S/V vs. ACEI or ARB in acute or chronic HF in August 2021. Primary outcomes were HF hospitalisations and cardiovascular (CV) mortality; secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, biomarkers, and renal function. Results: We selected 11 RCTs ( Conclusions: Sacubitril/valsartan had better clinical, intermediate, and renal outcomes in HF in comparison to ACEI or ARB. There was no difference in angioedema and hyperkalaemia events, but there were more hypotension events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.