ArticleIEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques2022
Near-Field Microwave Scattering Formulation by A Deep Learning Method.
Article in IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning in Microwave Medical Imaging and Lesion Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A deep learning method is applied to modelling electromagnetic (EM) scattering for microwave breast imaging (MBI). The neural network (NN) accepts 2D dielectric breast maps at 3 GHz and produces scattered-field data on an antenna array composed of 24 transmitters and 24 receivers. The NN was trained by 18,000 synthetic digital breast phantoms generated by generative adversarial network (GAN), and the scattered-field data pre-calculated by method of moments (MOM). Validation was performed by comparing the 2,000 NN-produced datasets isolated from the training data with the data computed by MOM. Finally, data generated by NN and MOM were used for image reconstruction. The reconstruction demonstrated that errors caused by NN would not significantly affect the image result. But the computational speed of NN was nearly 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.