ArticleCureus2023
Rectus Sheath Hematoma as a Complication in Patients With COVID-19: Clinical and Imaging Findings.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rectus sheath hematoma in pregnancy: a case report with literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Portable Percussive Massage Device-Related Rectus Sheath Hematoma and Obstructive Uropathy: A Case Report.Biomedicine hubArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives This study aims to investigate the frequency of rectus sheath hematoma (RSH), clinical findings, imaging findings, and prognosis in patients admitted to the hospital due to COVID-19. Methods In this retrospective study, the patient's demographic characteristics, known diseases, laboratory values, RSH-related symptoms, the treatment they received, imaging modality used to diagnose RSH, and side and size of RSH were recorded. In addition, the inpatient ward to which the patients were admitted, length of hospital stay, time from the beginning of anticoagulant use to the diagnosis of RSH, and prognosis were noted. Results A total of 9,876 patients were admitted to the hospital due to COVID-19 and started anticoagulant treatment. Of these patients, 12 (0.12%) were determined to have RSH (female/male ratio: 5). The prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, hemoglobin, and hematocrit values of 11 patients were within the reference ranges. The mean length of hospital stay was 12 (4.25-22.5) days, and the duration of anticoagulant use was 5.5 (4-10.75) days. RSH was diagnosed using USG in 10 patients and CT in two patients. Conclusion There has been an increase in the use of anticoagulants due to COVID-19, and accordingly, RSH is now more frequently diagnosed and has a more fatal course. Female gender, advanced age, severe COVID-19 disease, and elevated d-dimer at the time of presentation can be considered risk factors for the development of RSH. All physicians who treat and follow up on patients with COVID-19 should consider the possibility of RSH in the differential diagnosis of patients with acute abdominal pain and palpable masses. USG should be undertaken as the first-line imaging modality for the diagnosis of patients, but CT may also be necessary to detect RSH in some cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.