ArticleBioinformation2022
YAPPIS-Finder: A novel method for protein-protein interaction site predictions.
Article in Bioinformation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe a multi parametric-approach, YAPPIS-Finder, for predicting the PPI sites on protein surface. A non-redundant database of comprised of 2,265 protein-protein interaction interfaces (PPIIs) involving 4,530 protein-protein interacting partners (PPIPs) and depicting the interaction between protein-chains of experimentally determined PPCs was used in designing the YAPPIS-Finder. Parametric score obtained on analyzing these 4,530 PPIPs with respect to their residue interface propensity, their hydrophobic content, and amount of solvation free energy associated with them provided the basis of YAPPIS-Finder. By applying YAPPIS-Finder on another dataset 4,290 PPIPs from 2,145 PPIIs, the optimal range of the parametric scores and protein-probe van der Waals energy of interaction was determined. Subsequently, taking the optimal range of PPIP parametric scores and threshold for protein-probe van der Waals energy of interaction into the consideration, the YAPPIS-Finder was tested on a blind dataset of 554 protein-chains and it was found predicting 69.67% sites correctly. On predicting only one PPI site on each protein-chain, the YAPPIS-Finder found covering 22.91% of actually sites in the predicted site. Contrary to this, the sites predicted by SPPIDER covered 22.7% of actual sites. However, on predicting two PPI sites for each protein-chain, the percentage coverage of actual sites in the predicted sites by YAPPIS-Finder exceeded two-fold (i.e. 41.81%), thus making the YAPPIS-Finder a better method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.