ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2023
Effectiveness of CO-OP Approach for Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review.
Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) in Parkinson's: Randomized Trial Findings.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026Trial
- Implementing the Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) Approach with Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: A Feasibility Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Motor imagery as a cognitive mechanism in interventions for children with developmental coordination disorder: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- International health professional perspectives of using the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance approach in routine practice.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Occupation-Based Tele-Intervention for Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Pilot Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparing the CO-OP ApproachBrain sciences · 2025Article
- National assessment of early intervention services for children with developmental disorders in Lithuania: A mixed-methods study on gaps and future directions.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance approach in childhood-onset disabilities.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Review
- El enfoque de Orientación Cognitiva al Desempeño Ocupacional Diario en discapacidades con origen en la infancia.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Review
- The CO-OP Approach: A transdiagnostic perspective.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
- Psychological Interventions to Improve Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction Post-stroke: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) for mood, anxiety, and adjustment disorders: a pilot study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of the Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach for children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Data Sources: Selected articles published between January 2001 and September 2020 and listed in CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO on the EBSCO platform, or found searching with Scopus, Google Scholar, OTseekern Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Turning Research into Practice, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. An update was performed in March 2022. Study Selection: Eligibility criteria included studies that assessed the effectiveness of the CO-OP approach on children (0-18 years) with NDDs. Unpublished results were excluded, as well as research published in a language other than English or French. Data Selection: The first 2 authors independently reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full texts. Discrepancies were discussed and resolved by consensus. Included studies were quality appraised using the PEDro-P scale or using the risk of bias scale in N-of-1 trials (RoBiNT) according to experimental design. Data Synthesis: Results were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Eighteen studies were initially included, with 2 additional studies added in the update. Three reached evidence level III (15%), 10 reached level IV (70%), and 5 reached level V (15%). All data collected on the activity-participation domain showed a significant improvement. Group therapy sessions show promising results for the improvement of activities or participation, as well as psychosocial dimensions such as self-esteem. Conclusions: The scientific evidence analyzed shows that the CO-OP approach has a positive effect on children with NDDs, particularly in regard to their activities and participation. Future experimental studies should be designed in ways that allow determining effect sizes. Group therapy sessions appear relevant but require further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.