Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37312973›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023

Deep learning for automated contouring of neurovascular structures on magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer patients.

Ingeborg van den Berg, Mark H F Savenije, Frederik R Teunissen, Sandrine M G van de Pol, Marnix J A Rasing, Harm H E van Melick, Wyger M Brink, Johannes C J de Boer, Cornelis A T van den Berg, Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. In response to Grivas et al.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ingeborg van den BergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mark H F SavenijeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frederik R TeunissenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sandrine M G van de PolDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marnix J A RasingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Harm H E van MelickDepartment of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wyger M BrinkMagnetic Detection and Imaging Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Johannes C J de BoerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelis A T van den BergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jochem R N van der Voort van ZypDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Manual contouring of neurovascular structures on prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is labor-intensive and prone to considerable interrater disagreement. Our aim is to contour neurovascular structures automatically on prostate MRI by deep learning (DL) to improve workflow and interrater agreement. Materials and methods: Segmentation of neurovascular structures was performed on pre-treatment 3.0 T MRI data of 131 prostate cancer patients (training [n = 105] and testing [n = 26]). The neurovascular structures include the penile bulb (PB), corpora cavernosa (CCs), internal pudendal arteries (IPAs), and neurovascular bundles (NVBs). Two DL networks, nnU-Net and DeepMedic, were trained for auto-contouring on prostate MRI and evaluated using volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distances (MSD), Hausdorff distances, and surface DSC. Three radiation oncologists evaluated the DL-generated contours and performed corrections when necessary. Interrater agreement was assessed and the time required for manual correction was recorded. Results: nnU-Net achieved a median DSC of 0.92 (IQR: 0.90-0.93) for the PB, 0.90 (IQR: 0.86-0.92) for the CCs, 0.79 (IQR: 0.77-0.83) for the IPAs, and 0.77 (IQR: 0.72-0.81) for the NVBs, which outperformed DeepMedic for each structure (p < 0.03). nnU-Net showed a median MSD of 0.24 mm for the IPAs and 0.71 mm for the NVBs. The median interrater DSC ranged from 0.93 to 1.00, with the majority of cases (68.9%) requiring manual correction times under two minutes. Conclusions: DL enables reliable auto-contouring of neurovascular structures on pre-treatment MRI data, easing the clinical workflow in neurovascular-sparing MR-guided radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)ContouringDeep learning (DL)Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT)Neurovascular-sparingProstate cancer (PCa)

Identifiers

PMID37312973
PMCPMC10258498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.