ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2023
Carcinoma vulva: Ten years experience in a teaching institution of North India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surface-Guided Radiotherapy for Vulvar Cancer in the Frog-Leg Position: Setup Accuracy and BMI Effects.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Prognostic Factors for Vulvar Cancer Undergoing Primary Surgery: Case Series from a Single Tertiary Cancer Center.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Vulvar carcinoma is primarily a disease of post-menopausal women. Surgery is a primary treatment strategy. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are a part of multimodal therapy. Presently, there is a shift towards neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy so as to decrease the surgical morbidities. Objective: To study the surgical outcome and prognostic factors in Ca vulva patients. Methodology: A retrospective analysis of 19 vulvar cancer patients, surgically treated at a teaching institution of Punjab (2009-2019). Results: Mean age of the patients was 60.95 years. Ulcerative swelling (89.5%) over labia majora (73.7%) was the main presenting symptom. Radical vulvectomy-bilateral IFLN dissection was performed in 74% patients, hemivulvectomy-unilateral IFLN dissection in 21% patients and wide local excision in one patient. Squamous cell carcinoma was detected in all, and one had verrucous carcinoma. Thirty-seven per cent patients had FIGO stage III disease, 31.5% - stage II and 31.5% - stage I. On HPE, 78.57% (11/14) patients had positive nodes and two had ECS. Only 5/9 (55.5%) cases could receive PORT. Seven patients defaulted follow-up. Two developed nodal metastasis, and seven women developed recurrence. One patient with regional recurrence faced demise during RT course. In 10/19 regular follow-up patients, four are alive and disease free, five patients are on palliative chemoradiation, and one is undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy for regional recurrence. Estimated 5-year overall survival is 83.33%. Conclusion: Tumour stage, nodal positivity and nodal ECS were poor prognostic factors. Radical surgery-extensive groin node dissection causes significant morbidity; hence, studies evaluating the role of neoadjuvant treatment are needed so as to modify current treatment practices. HPV vaccination as a preventive measure and a thorough and extensive evaluation of patients with suspicious signs in vulvar disease is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.