Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37312683›Full record

ArticleDigital discovery2023

Beyond ManifoldEM: geometric relationships between manifold embeddings of a continuum of 3D molecular structures and their 2D projections.

Evan Seitz, Joachim Frank, Peter Schwander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Evan SeitzDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Medical Center New York NY 10032 USA ees2192@columbia.edu jf2192@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6844-2444
Joachim FrankDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Medical Center New York NY 10032 USA ees2192@columbia.edu jf2192@cumc.columbia.edu.
Peter SchwanderDepartment of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee WI 53211 USA pschwan@uwm.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2350-8838

Funding

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF MACROMOLECULAR ASSEMBLIESR01GM029169 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI FRANK, JOACHIM · 1985 to 2019
$6.1M
Time-resolved Cryo-EM of Short-lived States in Eukaryotic TranslationR01GM055440 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI FRANK, JOACHIM · 1997 to 2020
$5.1M
Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies Using Cryo-EMR35GM139453 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FRANK, JOACHIM · 2021 to 2025
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM029169NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM055440NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ManifoldEM is an established method of geometric machine learning developed to extract information on conformational motions of molecules from their projections obtained by cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM). In a previous work, in-depth analysis of the properties of manifolds obtained for simulated ground-truth data from molecules exhibiting domain motions has led to improvements of this method, as demonstrated in selected applications of single-particle cryo-EM. In the present work this analysis has been extended to investigate the properties of manifolds constructed by embedding data from synthetic models represented by atomic coordinates in motion, or three-dimensional density maps from biophysical experiments other than single-particle cryo-EM, with extensions to cryo-electron tomography and single-particle imaging with a X-ray free-electron laser. Our theoretical analysis revealed interesting relationships between all these manifolds, which can be exploited in future work.

Identifiers

PMID37312683
PMCPMC10259371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.