Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37312587›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2023

A double-robust test for high-dimensional gene coexpression networks conditioning on clinical information.

Maomao Ding, Ruosha Li, Jin Qin, Jing Ning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maomao DingMeta Platforms, Inc., Menlo Park, California, USA.
Ruosha LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3595-4392
Jin QinBiostatistics Research Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2817-6326
Jing NingDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5289-331X

Funding

Statistical Methods for Integration of Multiple Data Sources toward Precision Cancer MedicineR01CA269696 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI JING NING, YU SHEN · 2022 to 2026
$1.7M
Modeling and Validation for Tackling Risk Prediction with Competing Risks by Integrating Multiple Longitudinal BiomarkersR01DK117209 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI LI, RUOSHA · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
Statistical methods for regression modeling of global percentile outcome in neurological diseasesR03NS108136 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI LI, RUOSHA · 2019 to 2020
$169k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269696NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK117209NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS108136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been increasingly appealing to evaluate whether expression levels of two genes in a gene coexpression network are still dependent given samples' clinical information, in which the conditional independence test plays an essential role. For enhanced robustness regarding model assumptions, we propose a class of double-robust tests for evaluating the dependence of bivariate outcomes after controlling for known clinical information. Although the proposed test relies on the marginal density functions of bivariate outcomes given clinical information, the test remains valid as long as one of the density functions is correctly specified. Because of the closed-form variance formula, the proposed test procedure enjoys computational efficiency without requiring a resampling procedure or tuning parameters. We acknowledge the need to infer the conditional independence network with high-dimensional gene expressions, and further develop a procedure for multiple testing by controlling the false discovery rate. Numerical results show that our method accurately controls both the type-I error and false discovery rate, and it provides certain levels of robustness regarding model misspecification. We apply the method to a gastric cancer study with gene expression data to understand the associations between genes belonging to the transforming growth factor β signaling pathway given cancer-stage information.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksNeoplasmsHumansconditional independence testdouble robustfalse discovery rategene coexpression networkmodel misspecification

Identifiers

PMID37312587
PMCPMC10838184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.