ReviewJournal of chemical information and modeling2023
Machine Learning Strategies for Reaction Development: Toward the Low-Data Limit.
Review in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging Chemical Literature and Molecular Graphs: LLM-Augmented Enantioselectivity Prediction for Iridium-Catalyzed Asymmetric C-H Borylation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Competition-Derived Relative Reactivity and 3D Electronic-State Analysis of Site- and Facial Selectivity in NaBHJACS Au · 2026Article
- Predicting Substrate Reactivity in Oxidative Homocoupling of Phenols Using Positive and Unlabeled Machine Learning.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Predicting reaction conditions: a data-driven perspective.Chemical science · 2025Review
- Applying Active Learning toward Building a Generalizable Model for Ni-Photoredox Cross-Electrophile Coupling of Aryl and Alkyl Bromides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Recommending reaction conditions with label ranking.Chemical science · 2025Article
- Applying statistical modeling strategies to sparse datasets in synthetic chemistry.Science advances · 2025Review
- Deep Kernel learning for reaction outcome prediction and optimization.Communications chemistry · 2024Article
- Predicting success in Cu-catalyzed C-N coupling reactions using data science.Science advances · 2024Article
- Dataset Design for Building Models of Chemical Reactivity.ACS central science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning models are increasingly being utilized to predict outcomes of organic chemical reactions. A large amount of reaction data is used to train these models, which is in stark contrast to how expert chemists discover and develop new reactions by leveraging information from a small number of relevant transformations. Transfer learning and active learning are two strategies that can operate in low-data situations, which may help fill this gap and promote the use of machine learning for tackling real-world challenges in organic synthesis. This Perspective introduces active and transfer learning and connects these to potential opportunities and directions for further research, especially in the area of prospective development of chemical transformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.