Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37312404›Full record

ArticleMedical mycology2023

The Argentinian landscape of mycological diagnostic capacity and treatment accessibility.

Fernando Riera, Juan Pablo Caeiro, Oliver A Cornely, Jon Salmanton-García, Argentinian IFI diagnostic and treatment capacity group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical mycology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Changing Climate, ChangingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antifungal stewardship: the Latin American experience.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fernando RieraDivision of Infectious Diseases, Sanatorio Allende, Córdoba, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-0618-1899
Juan Pablo CaeiroResearch Group of Immunology and Mycology, Córdoba, Argentina.
Oliver A CornelyUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9599-3137
Jon Salmanton-GarcíaUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6766-8297
Argentinian IFI diagnostic and treatment capacity group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunosuppressed patients, transplant recipients, and those with acute or chronic respiratory disease are at increased risk for invasive fungal infections in Argentina. Although the national public system guarantees universal access to health care for all citizens, little is known about the quality of available diagnostic and treatment armamentaria for invasive fungal infections in the country. Between June and August 2022, infectious disease clinicians from each of the 23 provinces and the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires were contacted to describe local access to fungal diagnostic tools and antifungal agents. The information collected included different aspects such as hospital characteristics, patients admitted and wards, access to diagnostic tools, estimated infection incidence, and treatment capacity. Thirty responses were collected from facilities throughout Argentina. Most institutions were governmental (77%). A mycology department was available in 83% of them. Histopathology was available in almost 93% of the sites, while automated methods and galactomannan tests were available in 57%, each; 53% of the sites had access to MALDI-TOF-MS through regional reference laboratories, and PCR was present in 20% of the sites. Susceptibility testing was available in 63% of the laboratories. Candida spp. (24%), Cryptococcus spp. (20%), Aspergillus spp. (18%), and Histoplasma spp. (16%) were described as the main pathogens. Fluconazole was the only antifungal agent available in all institutions. This was followed by amphotericin B deoxycholate (83%) and itraconazole (80%). If an antifungal agent was not available onsite, then 60% of the patients could receive adequate antifungal treatment within the first 48 h upon request. Although there are no significant differences in access to diagnostic and clinical management of invasive fungal infections among the Argentinean centres studied, national awareness-raising initiatives led by policymakers could help to improve their general availability.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsInvasive Fungal InfectionsAnimalsArgentinaFluconazoleItraconazoleAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleItraconazoleantifungalsantigenArgentinaculturediagnostic capacitymicroscopymolecular testmycologyserology

Identifiers

PMID37312404
PMCPMC10313093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.