Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37312275›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2023

Angiogenesis and flap-related research: A bibliometric analysis.

Xiao-Fei Tong, Zhen-Yang Xiao, Pei-Ting Li, Xin Liu, Ming-Zhu Wang, Shi-Yi Wen, Na Wang, Shenghui Liao, Jian-Da Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiao-Fei TongDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhen-Yang XiaoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Pei-Ting LiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xin LiuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ming-Zhu WangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shi-Yi WenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Na WangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shenghui LiaoSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jian-Da ZhouDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province of China 2018SK2081Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province of China 2018SK2083Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province of China 2018SK2084Science and Technology Program of Hunan Province 2018JJ2616Science and Technology Program of Hunan Province 2021SK53714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate blood supply, a prerequisite for flap survival after grafting, makes angiogenesis of the flap the biggest problem to be solved. Researches have been conducted around vascularisation in correlation with flap grafting. However, bibliometric analyses systematically examining this research field are lacking. As such, we herein sought to conduct comprehensive comparative analyses of the contributions of different researchers, institutions, and countries to this research space in an effort to identify trends and hotspots in angiogenesis and vascularisation in the context of flap grafting. Publications pertaining to angiogenesis and vascularisation in the context of flap grafting were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. References were then analysed and plotted using Microsoft Excel 2019, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace V. In total, 2234 papers that were cited 40 048 times (17.63 citations/paper) were included in this analysis. The greatest number of studies were from the United States, with these studies exhibiting both the highest number of citations (13 577) and the greatest overall H-index (60). For The institutions that published the greatest number of studies were WENZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (681), while UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG has the highest number of citations (1458), and SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY holds the greatest overall H-index (20). The greatest number of studies in this research space were published by Gao WY, while Horch RE was the most commonly cited researcher in the field. The VOS viewer software clustered relevant keywords into three clusters, with clusters 1, 2, 3, and 4 corresponding to studies in which the keywords 'anatomy', 'survival', 'transplantation', 'therapy' most frequently appeared. The most promising research hotspot-related terms in this field included 'autophagy', 'oxidative stress', 'ischemia/reperfusion injury', which exhibited a most recent average appearing year (AAY) of 2017 and after. Generally speaking, the results of this analysis indicate that the number of articles exploring angiogenesis and flap-related research has risen steadily, with the United States and China being the two countries publishing the greatest proportion of studies in this field. The overall focus of these studies has shifted away from 'infratest and tissue engineering' towards 'mechanisms'. In the future, particular attention should be paid to emerging research hotspots, which include 'ischemia/reperfusion injury' and treatments for promoting vascularization, such as 'platelet-rich plasma'. In light of these findings, funding agencies should continue increasing their investment in the exploration of the concrete mechanisms and interventional therapeutic relevance of angiogenesis during flap transplantation.

Indexed as

BibliometricsReperfusion InjuryAutophagyChinaHumansIschemiabibliometric analysisflapglobal trendsregenerative medicinevascularisation

Identifiers

PMID37312275
PMCPMC10502283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.