Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37312189›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2023

Perspectives of users for a future interactive wearable system for upper extremity rehabilitation following stroke: a qualitative study.

Chieh-Ling Yang, Rochelle Chui, W Ben Mortenson, Peyman Servati, Amir Servati, Arvin Tashakori, Janice J Eng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chieh-Ling YangDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5115-2608
Rochelle ChuiFaculty of Applied Science and Faculty of Medicine, Undergraduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
W Ben MortensonCentre for Aging SMART at Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0183-6163
Peyman ServatiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0146-1557
Amir ServatiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Arvin TashakoriDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Janice J EngCentre for Aging SMART at Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada. janice.eng@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2093-0788
University of British Columbia · CAChang Gung University · TWUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CAVancouver Coastal Health · CA

Funding

CIHR CPG-170611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable sensor technology can facilitate diagnostics and monitoring of people with upper extremity (UE) paresis after stroke. The purpose of this study is to investigate the perspectives of clinicians, people living with stroke, and their caregivers on an interactive wearable system that detects UE movements and provides feedback.

methodsThis qualitative study used semi-structured interviews relating to the perspectives of a future interactive wearable system including a wearable sensor to capture UE movement and a user interface to provide feedback as the means of data collection. Ten rehabilitation therapists, 9 people with stroke, and 2 caregivers participated in this study.

resultsFour themes were identified (1) "Everyone is different" highlighted the need for addressing individual user's rehabilitation goal and personal preference; (2) "The wearable system should identify UE and trunk movements" emphasized that in addition to arm, hand, and finger movements, detecting compensatory trunk movements during UE movements is also of interest; (3) "Both quality and amount of movements are necessary to measure" described the parameters related to how well and how much the user is using their affected UE that participants envisioned the system to monitor; (4) "Functional activities should be practiced by the users" outlined UE movements and activities that are of priority in designing the system.

conclusionsNarratives from clinicians, people with stroke, and their caregivers offer insight into the design of interactive wearable systems. Future studies examining the experience and acceptability of existing wearable systems from end-users are warranted to guide the adoption of this technology.

Indexed as

StrokeWearable Electronic DevicesFingersHandHumansUpper ExtremityQualitative studyRehabilitationStrokeUpper limbWearable technology

Identifiers

PMID37312189
PMCPMC10265838
OpenAlexW4380480051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.