SynthesisAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2023
Knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review.
Synthesis in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infection Control in Optometric Practice: Evaluating the Impact of Guidelines on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Behaviours.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding transfusion-related acute lung injury among healthcare providers in Jiangsu: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of patients with multiple myeloma regarding venous thromboembolism: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Healthcare providers' knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding occupational exposure to human papillomaviruses.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards postmenopausal osteoporosis among postmenopausal women: A cross-sectional study.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Impact of targeted interventions on healthcare-acquired infection prevention and control of Clostridium difficile infections.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of family members of children aged 2-6 years with snoring regarding pediatric snoring and its management.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessment of medical students' knowledge regarding radiation associated risk and its protection: finding from a cross-sectional study.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Toward Disease Management and Biologic Therapy.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Middle-Aged and Elderly Population Towards Ultrasound Screening for Strokes.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Effect of educational intervention based on health belief model on nurses' compliance with standard precautions in preventing needle stick injuries.BMC nursing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical laboratories provide diagnostic testing services to support the effective delivery of care in today's complex healthcare systems. Processing clinical material and the use of chemicals or radiation presents potential hazard to laboratory workers, from both biological and chemical sources. Nevertheless, the laboratory should be a safe workplace if the identification of possible hazards, clear guidelines, safety rules and infection prevention and control (IPC) precautions are applied and followed. The main aim of this systematic review was to identify, critically appraise and synthesise the research evidence to gain a clear explanation of the implementation and knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of IPC guidelines among hospital laboratory staff.
methodsFor this systematic review we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and CINAHL (EBSCO), PubMed, grey literature, reference lists and citations for studies published between database inception and November, 2021. All qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies whose aim was to explore risk perception and KAP of IPC guidelines among laboratory staff in any healthcare setting were included, without language or date restrictions. Evidence was narratively synthesised into group of themes. The quality of the evidence was assessed with Joanna Briggs Institutes Critical Appraisal Tools.
resultsAfter the full-text screening, a total of 34 articles remained and were included in the final review. Thirty papers were considered to be of high quality and the remaining four were considered to be of low quality. The available evidence shows that there was good knowledge, good attitudes and moderate immunisation status, but there was still poor practice of IPC precautions and an inadequate level of training among laboratory workers.
conclusionThere is a gap among KAP related to the implementation of IPC guidelines, which indicates that laboratory staff may be at high risk of acquiring infections in the workplace. These findings suggest that training (including IPC precautions, safety policies, safety equipment and materials, safety activities, initial biohazard handling, ongoing monitoring and potential exposure) of laboratory staff to increase their knowledge about IPC precautions could improve their use of these precautions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.