Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37312127›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Nano X Image Guidance in radiation therapy: feasibility study protocol for cone beam computed tomography imaging with gravity-induced motion.

Emily Debrot, Paul Liu, Mark Gardner, Soo Min Heng, Chin Hwa Chan, Stephanie Corde, Simon Downes, Michael Jackson, Paul Keall

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04488224 (Nano-X Image Guidance), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04488224 early_phase1withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Nano-X Image Guidance: CBCT With Gravity-induced Motion

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SydneyRan2025 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsCancerArmsNano-X Patient Rotation System, Conventional CBCT scan, Psychometrically validated questionnaires
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily DebrotFaculty of Medicine and Health, ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Paul LiuFaculty of Medicine and Health, ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Mark GardnerFaculty of Medicine and Health, ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. mark.gardner@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-2547
Soo Min HengNelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Chin Hwa ChanNelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Stephanie CordeNelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Simon DownesNelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Michael JacksonNelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Paul KeallFaculty of Medicine and Health, ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1118450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper describes the protocol for the Nano X Image Guidance (Nano X IG) trial, a single-institution, clinical imaging study. The Nano X is a prototype fixed-beam radiotherapy system developed to investigate the feasibility of a low-cost, compact radiotherapy system to increase global access to radiation therapy. This study aims to assess the feasibility of volumetric image guidance with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquired during horizontal patient rotation on the Nano X radiotherapy system.

methodsIn the Nano X IG study, we will determine whether radiotherapy image guidance can be performed with the Nano X radiotherapy system where the patient is horizontally rotated while scan projections are acquired. We will acquire both conventional CBCT scans and Nano X CBCT scans for 30 patients aged 18 and above and receiving radiotherapy for head/neck or upper abdomen cancers. For each patient, a panel of experts will assess the image quality of Nano X CBCT scans against conventional CBCT scans. Each patient will receive two Nano X CBCT scans to determine the image quality reproducibility, the extent and reproducibility of patient motion and assess patient tolerance. DISCUSSION: Fixed-beam radiotherapy systems have the potential to help ease the current shortfall and increase global access to radiotherapy treatment. Advances in image guidance could facilitate fixed-beam radiotherapy using horizontal patient rotation. The efficacy of this radiotherapy approach is dependent on our ability to image and adapt to motion due to rotation and for patients to tolerate rotation during treatment.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04488224. Registered on 27 July 2020.

Indexed as

Cone beam CTImage-guided radiotherapyImage reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID37312127
PMCPMC10262489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.