Trial reportBMC palliative care2023
The clinical effect evaluation of multidisciplinary collaborative team combined with palliative care model in patients with terminal cancer: a randomised controlled study.
Trial report in BMC palliative care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05683236 (The Clinical Effect Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Collaborative Team Combined With Palliative Care Model in Patients With Terminal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Clinical Effect Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Collaborative Team Combined With Palliative Care Model in Patients With Terminal Cancer: A Randomised Controlled Study
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical efficacy analysis of surgical treatment for spinal metastasis under the multidisciplinary team using the NOMS decision system combined with the revised Tokuhashi scoring system: a randomized controlled study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Trial
- Communication Processes and Priorities in Medical Aid in Dying Conversations: A Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study of Multidisciplinary Cancer Clinicians.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Navigating the emotional burden: Addressing anxiety and depression across stages of hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies.World journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved patient-centered outcomes in multiple pulmonary nodules: a prospective observational cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Unpacking Multi-Layered Challenges in Palliative Care Transitions: A Descriptive Qualitative Study of Multidisciplinary Teams in China.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Article
- Using the P-CaRES Tool to Identify Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Life-Limiting Diseases: An Analysis of Internal Medicine Admissions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Interplay of Chronic Stress and Cancer: Pathophysiology and Implications for Integrated Care.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Nursing care for patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing surgery for esophageal variceal bleeding in an integrated healthcare system.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Emergency palliative cancer care: anxiety and midazolam.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Effects of multi-disciplinary team nursing model combined with high-fiber dietary intervention on blood glucose level and nutritional status in elderly type 2 diabetes patients: a prospective clinical trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Factors influencing healthcare professionals' rating on quality of death and dying: a nationwide cross-sectional study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Chronic Psychological Stress in Oncogenesis: Multisystem Crosstalk and Multimodal Interventions.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Bridging the digital readiness gap in palliative home care: A process to data approach.Digital healthArticle
- Palliative Care Social Work Standards of Practice - Review of Select International Protocols.Indian journal of palliative careReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical effect of a multidisciplinary collaboration team combined with a palliative care model in patients with terminal cancer.
methodA total of 84 patients diagnosed with terminal cancer in our hospital were included and randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group, with 42 cases in each group. Patients in the intervention group were treated by a multidisciplinary collaborative team combined with the palliative care model, and patients in the control group were treated by routine nursing intervention. The Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to evaluate negative emotions and anxiety and depression of patients before and after intervention. The Quality of Life Scale (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30) and Social Support Scale (SSRS) were used to evaluate the quality of life and social support of patients. This study has been registered in 13/01/2023 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05683236).
resultThe general data of the two groups were comparable. After intervention, the SAS (43.7 ± 7.4 vs. 54.2 ± 9.3) and SDS scores (38.4 ± 6.5 vs. 53.1 ± 8.4) of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the control group. The total SSRS score, subjective support score, objective support score and utilisation of support of the intervention group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The overall quality of life score of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (79.5 ± 4.5 vs. 73.2 ± 3.6, P < 0.05). The scores of each functional scale were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05).
conclusionCompared with conventional nursing, the application of the multidisciplinary collaborative team combined with tranquilisation therapy in patients with terminal cancer can significantly reduce the anxiety and depression of patients, enable patients to obtain comprehensive social support, and effectively improve the quality of life of patients.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05683236, 13/01/2023, Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.