Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37312085›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Patient handoffs and multi-specialty trainee perspectives across an institution: informing recommendations for health systems and an expanded conceptual framework for handoffs.

Sarah R Williams, Stefanie S Sebok-Syer, Holly Caretta-Weyer, Laurence Katznelson, Ann M Dohn, Yoon Soo Park, Michael A Gisondi, Ara Tekian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Simulation-Based Peer Feedback Module for Pediatric Rapid Response Team Handoffs.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah R WilliamsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 900 Welch Road, Suite 350, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. srwilliams@stanford.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5106-2688
Stefanie S Sebok-SyerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 900 Welch Road, Suite 350, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3572-5971
Holly Caretta-WeyerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 900 Welch Road, Suite 350, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9783-5797
Laurence KatznelsonDepartments of Neurosurgery and Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8115-5714
Ann M DohnGraduate Medical Education, Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Health Care, Stanford, USA.
Yoon Soo ParkDepartment of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-4335
Michael A GisondiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 900 Welch Road, Suite 350, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6800-3932
Ara TekianDepartment of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9252-1588
Stanford University · USStanford Health Care · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafe and effective physician-to-physician patient handoffs are integral to patient safety. Unfortunately, poor handoffs continue to be a major cause of medical errors. Developing a better understanding of challenges faced by health care providers is critical to address this continued patient safety threat. This study addresses the gap in the literature exploring broad, cross-specialty trainee perspectives around handoffs and provides a set of trainee-informed recommendations for both training programs and institutions.

methodsUsing a constructivist paradigm, the authors conducted a concurrent/embedded mixed method study to investigate trainees' experiences with patient handoffs across Stanford University Hospital, a large academic medical center. The authors designed and administered a survey instrument including Likert-style and open-ended questions to solicit information about trainee experiences from multiple specialties. The authors performed a thematic analysis of open-ended responses.

results687/1138 (60.4%) of residents and fellows responded to the survey, representing 46 training programs and over 30 specialties. There was wide variability in handoff content and process, most notably code status not being consistently mentioned a third of the time for patients who were not full code. Supervision and feedback about handoffs were inconsistently provided. Trainees identified multiple health-systems level issues that complicated handoffs and suggested solutions to these threats. Our thematic analysis identified five important aspects of handoffs: (1) handoff elements, (2) health-systems-level factors, (3) impact of the handoff, (4) agency (duty), and (5) blame and shame.

conclusionsHealth systems, interpersonal, and intrapersonal issues affect handoff communication. The authors propose an expanded theoretical framework for effective patient handoffs and provide a set of trainee-informed recommendations for training programs and sponsoring institutions. Cultural and health-systems issues must be prioritized and addressed, as an undercurrent of blame and shame permeates the clinical environment.

Indexed as

Patient HandoffHealth PersonnelHospitals, UniversityHumansMedical ErrorsBlameHandoffsMulti-specialtyShameTrainee perspectivesTransitions of care

Identifiers

PMID37312085
PMCPMC10262514
OpenAlexW4380482724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.