Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37312081›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Fogging to combat dengue: factors influencing stakeholders' attitudes in Malaysia.

Ahmad Firdhaus Arham, Latifah Amin, Muhammad Adzran Che Mustapa, Zurina Mahadi, Mashitoh Yaacob, Mohamad Muhidin Patahol Wasli, Noor Sharizad Rusly

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmad Firdhaus ArhamPusat Pengajian Citra Universiti, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. benferdaoz@ukm.edu.my.
Latifah AminThe Institute of Islam Hadhari (HADHARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. nilam@ukm.edu.my.
Muhammad Adzran Che MustapaCentre for Agro-Food Economy and Development (CREDA), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Casteldefells, Spain.
Zurina MahadiPusat Pengajian Citra Universiti, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mashitoh YaacobPusat Pengajian Citra Universiti, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohamad Muhidin Patahol WasliUCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK.
Noor Sharizad RuslyPusat Pengajian Citra Universiti, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFogging is a conventional technique used to combat Aedes mosquitoes and prevent dengue disease. It is often implemented in outbreak areas or areas harbouring a high density of Aedes mosquitoes. Currently, studies on stakeholders' attitudes towards fogging are still limited in number. Therefore, this study aims to assess Malaysian attitudes, and identify the predicting factors influencing such attitudes.

methodsA validated instrument was used to interview 399 randomly selected respondents from the public (n = 202, 50.6%) and scientists (n = 197, 49.4%) in the Klang Valley region of Malaysia. The data were analysed using PLS-SEM involving Smart-PLS software.

resultsThe results confirmed that stakeholder attitudes toward fogging should be viewed in terms of a multi-dimensional association. The stakeholders surveyed were highly positive with regard to the application of fogging to control dengue but professed moderate concerns as to associated risks. The PLS-SEM analyses demonstrated that the perceived benefit was the most important factor influencing attitudes, followed by trust in key players.

conclusionsThis result provides a good insight from the perspective of education and unravels the underlying fundamentals of stakeholders' attitudes toward the fogging technique. The findings also provide a positive indicator to the responsible parties involved to continue the usage of this technique in conjunction with improvements with regard to its safety aspects, and possibly in combination with other environmental-friendly alternatives in order to achieve a healthy environment without dengue in Malaysia.

Indexed as

AedesAttitude to HealthDengueFumigationAnimalsAsian PeopleAttitudeCommunicable Disease ControlHumansMalaysiaRandom AllocationStakeholder ParticipationAttitudeDengue diseaseFogging techniqueMalaysiaPLS-SEMStakeholder analysis

Identifiers

PMID37312081
PMCPMC10264093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.