ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023
Factors affecting satisfaction in patients with a rotator cuff retear: CT arthrography-based study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe relationship between retear that may occur after rotator cuff repair and patient satisfaction is not well established. This study aimed to determine whether the types and size of the retear evaluated by computed tomography arthrography (CTA) influenced patient satisfaction. We also analyzed the patient factors that could affect patient satisfaction. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 50 patients who were diagnosed with rotator cuff retear after undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were included in this study. All the patients were dichotomously classified into the satisfactory or dissatisfactory groups according to the patients' self-classifications. CTA was used to assess the attachment status of the footprint, detect retear on the medial side of the footprint of the repaired cuff, and determine the retear size. Demographic factors, including sex, age, occupation, dominant upper extremity, duration of pain, presence of diabetes mellitus, trauma history, history of ipsilateral shoulder surgery, repair technique, worker's compensation status, and functional shoulder score, were investigated.
resultsThirty-nine patients were classified into the satisfactory group and 11 patients were classified into the dissatisfactory group. There were no differences in age, sex, occupation, dominant hand, duration of pain, presence of diabetes mellitus, trauma history, history of ipsilateral shoulder surgery, repair technique, worker's compensation, and duration of follow-up between the two groups. However, the postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score (P < 0.01), visual analog scale (VAS) pain level (P < 0.01), anteroposterior (AP) length (P < 0.01), and area of the retear site (P < 0.01) were significantly different.
conclusionThe AP length and area of the retear site estimated using CTA were confirmed as the significant risk factors for dissatisfaction. However, the type of repaired rotator cuff judged by the attachment status of the footprint did not correlate with patient satisfaction. In addition, the postoperative VAS pain scale and ASES score was correlated with patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.