Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37312049›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2023

Relebactam restores susceptibility of resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhances imipenem activity against chromosomal AmpC-producing species: analysis of global SMART 2018-2020.

David W Hilbert, C Andrew DeRyke, Mary Motyl, Meredith Hackel, Katherine Young

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. R pyocin sensitivity ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Lipopolysaccharide-targeting treatments for multidrug-resistantExpert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Metallo-β-lactamase-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  12. In-vitro activity of the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas spp. clinical isolates collected in Switzerland in 2022.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility/resistance to cefiderocol: which are the best present and future therapeutic alternatives?European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David W HilbertMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA. david.hilbert@merck.com.
C Andrew DeRykeMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Mary MotylMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Meredith HackelInternational Health Management Associates, Inc, Schaumburg, IL, USA.
Katherine YoungMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarbapenem-resistant bacteria are an increasing problem in clinical practice; thus, it is important to identify β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., relebactam) that can restore carbapenem susceptibility. We report analyses of relebactam enhancement of imipenem activity against both imipenem-nonsusceptible (NS) and imipenem-susceptible (S) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. Gram-negative bacterial isolates were collected for the ongoing Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends global surveillance program. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-defined broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were used to determine the imipenem and imipenem/relebactam antibacterial susceptibilities of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates.

resultsBetween 2018 and 2020, 36.2% of P. aeruginosa (N = 23,073) and 8.2% of Enterobacterales (N = 91,769) isolates were imipenem-NS. Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility in 64.1% and 49.4% of imipenem-NS P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates, respectively. Restoration of susceptibility was largely observed among K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenemase-negative P. aeruginosa. Relebactam also caused a lowering of imipenem MIC among imipenem-S P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates from chromosomal Ambler class C β-lactamase (AmpC)-producing species. For both imipenem-NS and imipenem-S P. aeruginosa isolates, relebactam reduced the imipenem MIC mode from 16 μg/mL to 1 μg/mL and from 2 μg/mL to 0.5 μg/mL, respectively, compared with imipenem alone.

conclusionsRelebactam restored imipenem susceptibility among nonsusceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhanced imipenem susceptibility among susceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and isolates from Enterobacterales species that can produce chromosomal AmpC. The reduced imipenem modal MIC values with relebactam may result in a higher probability of target attainment in patients.

Indexed as

GammaproteobacteriaImipenemAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsCarbapenemsHumansPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsCarbapenemsImipenemrelebactamAntibacterial agentsAntibacterial susceptibilityBacterial infectionsCarbapenemGram-negative bacteriaImipenemMinimum inhibitory concentrationRelebactam

Identifiers

PMID37312049
PMCPMC10262423
OpenAlexW4380576461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.