Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37312027›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2023

Efficacy and safety of esketamine for sedation among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xianghong Lian, Yunzhu Lin, Ting Luo, Yang Jing, Hongbo Yuan, Yixin Guo

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Median effective dose (EDBMC anesthesiology · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Clinical applications of esketamine: Current status and future perspectives.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xianghong LianDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No.20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Yunzhu LinDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No.20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China. linyunzhu99@163.com.
Ting LuoDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No.20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Yang JingDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No.20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Hongbo YuanDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No.20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Yixin GuoDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No.20, Third Section, Renmin Nan Lu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients who undergo gastrointestinal endoscopy often require propofol-based sedation combined with analgesics. At present, the efficacy and safety of esketamine as an adjunct to propofol for sedation during endoscopic procedures in patients remains controversial. Moreover, there is no universal agreement regarding the appropriate dose of esketamine supplementation. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of esketamine as an adjunct to propofol for sedation during endoscopic procedures in patients.

methodsSeven electronic databases and three clinical trial registry platforms were searched and the deadline was February 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of esketamine for sedation were included by two reviewers. Data from the eligible studies were combined to calculate the pooled risk ratio or standardized mean difference.

resultsEighteen studies with 1962 esketamine participants were included in the analysis. As an adjunct to propofol, the administration of esketamine reduced the recovery time compared to normal saline (NS). However, there was no significant difference between the opioids group and ketamine group. For propofol dosage, the administration of esketamine required a lower propofol dosage compared to the NS group and opioids group].For complications, the esketamine group had fewer complications compared to the NS group and opioid group in patients, but there were no significant differences between the esketamine group and ketamine group. Notably, the coadministration of esketamine was associated with a higher risk of visual disturbance compared to the NS group. In addition, we used subgroup analysis to investigate whether 0.2-0.5 mg/kg esketamine was effective and tolerable for patients.

conclusionEsketamine as an adjunct to propofol, is an appropriate effective alternative for sedation in participants undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, considering the possibility of its psychotomimetic effects, esketamine should be used with caution.

Indexed as

KetaminePropofolAnalgesics, OpioidEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHumansSaline SolutionAnalgesics, OpioidEsketamineKetaminePropofolSaline SolutionAnesthesiaEsketamineGastroscopyMeta-analysisPropofol

Identifiers

PMID37312027
PMCPMC10262466
OpenAlexW4380483724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.