Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37311965›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Tool-tissue force segmentation and pattern recognition for evaluating neurosurgical performance.

Amir Baghdadi, Sanju Lama, Rahul Singh, Garnette R Sutherland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cross-Stream and Cross-Channel Attention Networks for Surgical Skill Classification in Open Surgery From Hand Kinematics.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Design and Performance of a Neurosurgery Assisting Device.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Force Profile as Surgeon-Specific Signature.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amir BaghdadiProject neuroArm, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sanju LamaProject neuroArm, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Rahul SinghProject neuroArm, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Garnette R SutherlandProject neuroArm, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. garnette@ucalgary.ca.
University of Calgary · CAAllen Institute for Brain Science · US

Funding

CIHR 390405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical data quantification and comprehension expose subtle patterns in tasks and performance. Enabling surgical devices with artificial intelligence provides surgeons with personalized and objective performance evaluation: a virtual surgical assist. Here we present machine learning models developed for analyzing surgical finesse using tool-tissue interaction force data in surgical dissection obtained from a sensorized bipolar forceps. Data modeling was performed using 50 neurosurgery procedures that involved elective surgical treatment for various intracranial pathologies. The data collection was conducted by 13 surgeons of varying experience levels using sensorized bipolar forceps, SmartForceps System. The machine learning algorithm constituted design and implementation for three primary purposes, i.e., force profile segmentation for obtaining active periods of tool utilization using T-U-Net, surgical skill classification into Expert and Novice, and surgical task recognition into two primary categories of Coagulation versus non-Coagulation using FTFIT deep learning architectures. The final report to surgeon was a dashboard containing recognized segments of force application categorized into skill and task classes along with performance metrics charts compared to expert level surgeons. Operating room data recording of > 161 h containing approximately 3.6 K periods of tool operation was utilized. The modeling resulted in Weighted F1-score = 0.95 and AUC = 0.99 for force profile segmentation using T-U-Net, Weighted F1-score = 0.71 and AUC = 0.81 for surgical skill classification, and Weighted F1-score = 0.82 and AUC = 0.89 for surgical task recognition using a subset of hand-crafted features augmented to FTFIT neural network. This study delivers a novel machine learning module in a cloud, enabling an end-to-end platform for intraoperative surgical performance monitoring and evaluation. Accessed through a secure application for professional connectivity, a paradigm for data-driven learning is established.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSurgeonsDissectionElective Surgical ProceduresHumansMonitoring, Intraoperative

Identifiers

PMID37311965
PMCPMC10264433
OpenAlexW4380577731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.