ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2024
Complete thoracoscopic lobectomy versus hybrid video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical impact of surgical approaches on early-phase postoperative air leakage.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Comparison of the efficacy of subxiphoid and intercostal uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is the standard approach to lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are many different types. One of its approaches is complete thoracoscopic surgery (CTS), which may be less invasive because of low chest wall stress. This study compared the treatment outcomes of CTS and hybrid VATS lobectomy for NSCLC.
methodsIn total, 442 eligible patients with clinical N0 NSCLC underwent lobectomy between 2007 and 2016. Patients were classified into a group of patients who underwent CTS and a group of those who underwent hybrid VATS. Propensity score matching was performed between the two groups.
resultsThere were 175 patients after matching. The median follow-up period in the CTS and hybrid VATS groups was 60 and 63 months, respectively. The CTS group showed less blood loss (CTS, 50 mL vs. 100 mL, p = 0.005), fewer complications (CTS, 25.7% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.037), and shorter postoperative hospital stays (CTS, 8 days vs. 12 days, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the postoperative 30-day mortality rates. Between the patients who underwent CTS and hybrid VATS groups, the 5-year overall survival rates were 85.4% and 86.0% (p = 0.701), the relapse-free survival rates were 76.5% and 74.9% (p = 0.435), and the lung cancer-specific survival rates were 91.5% and 91.7% (p = 0.90), respectively.
conclusionsCTS is less invasive and has superior short-term outcomes as an approach to lobectomy for early-stage NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.