Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37311937›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2023

Delivery mechanism can enhance probiotic activity against honey bee pathogens.

Brendan A Daisley, Andrew P Pitek, Christina Torres, Robin Lowery, Bethany A Adair, Kait F Al, Bernardo Niño, Jeremy P Burton, Emma Allen-Vercoe, Graham J Thompson and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of Direct-Fed Microorganism Syrup on Honey Bee (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Probiotic Potential ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in insect science · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Brendan A DaisleyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5999-5792
Andrew P PitekDepartment of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada.
Christina TorresDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Robin LoweryDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Bethany A AdairDepartment of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9677-7962
Kait F AlDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada.
Bernardo NiñoDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Jeremy P BurtonDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3591-6436
Emma Allen-VercoeDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8716-327X
Graham J ThompsonDepartment of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5340-7467
Gregor Reid *Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9658-5696
Elina Niño *Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. elnino@ucdavis.edu.
Western University · CAUniversity of California, Davis · USAgricultural Research Service · USUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources · USUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managed honey bee (Apis mellifera) populations play a crucial role in supporting pollination of food crops but are facing unsustainable colony losses, largely due to rampant disease spread within agricultural environments. While mounting evidence suggests that select lactobacilli strains (some being natural symbionts of honey bees) can protect against multiple infections, there has been limited validation at the field-level and few methods exist for applying viable microorganisms to the hive. Here, we compare how two different delivery systems-standard pollen patty infusion and a novel spray-based formulation-affect supplementation of a three-strain lactobacilli consortium (LX3). Hives in a pathogen-dense region of California are supplemented for 4 weeks and then monitored over a 20-week period for health outcomes. Results show both delivery methods facilitate viable uptake of LX3 in adult bees, although the strains do not colonize long-term. Despite this, LX3 treatments induce transcriptional immune responses leading to sustained decreases in many opportunistic bacterial and fungal pathogens, as well as selective enrichment of core symbionts including Bombilactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Bartonella spp. These changes are ultimately associated with greater brood production and colony growth relative to vehicle controls, and with no apparent trade-offs in ectoparasitic Varroa mite burdens. Furthermore, spray-LX3 exerts potent activities against Ascosphaera apis (a deadly brood pathogen) likely stemming from in-hive dispersal differences, whereas patty-LX3 promotes synergistic brood development via unique nutritional benefits. These findings provide a foundational basis for spray-based probiotic application in apiculture and collectively highlight the importance of considering delivery method in disease management strategies.

Indexed as

ProbioticsVarroidaeAnimalsBacteriaBeekeepingBeesDietary SupplementsLactobacillus

Identifiers

PMID37311937
PMCPMC10432525
OpenAlexW4380538413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.