Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37311873›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2023

Cognitive impairment in people living with HIV: consensus recommendations for a new approach.

Sam Nightingale, Beau Ances, Paola Cinque, Ameet Dravid, Anna J Dreyer, Magnus Gisslén, John A Joska, Judith Kwasa, Ana-Claire Meyer, Nombeko Mpongo and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Increased Amyloidogenic Neuronal Injury in HIV-1-infected APP-KI Alzheimer's disease mice.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.

Sam NightingaleHIV Mental Health Research Unit, Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. sam.nightingale@uct.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7870-5287
Beau AncesDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Paola CinqueUnit of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Institute, Milan, Italy.
Ameet DravidDepartment of Medicine, Poona Hospital and Research Centre and Noble Hospital, Pune, India.
Anna J DreyerHIV Mental Health Research Unit, Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-3431
Magnus GisslénInstitute of Biomedicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
John A JoskaHIV Mental Health Research Unit, Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Judith KwasaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Health Science, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ana-Claire MeyerDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nombeko MpongoDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Cape Town, South Africa.
Noeline NakasujjaDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Roger PebodyNAM, London, UK.
Anton PozniakDepartment of HIV Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Richard W PriceDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5429-6044
Christopher SandfordUK Community Advisory Board (UK-CAB), London, UK.
Deanna SaylorDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kevin G F ThomasApplied Cognitive Science and Experimental Neuropsychology Team (ACSENT), Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jonathan UnderwoodDivision of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6963-2821
Jaime H VeraDepartment of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Alan WinstonDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
University of Cape Town · ZAJohns Hopkins University · USBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBDesmond Tutu HIV Foundation · ZAMakerere University · UGMind · GBNoble Hospital · INSahlgrenska University Hospital · SESan Raffaele University of Rome · ITSt Mary's Hospital · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Nairobi · KEWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T023791/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current approaches to classifying cognitive impairment in people living with HIV can overestimate disease burden and lead to ambiguity around disease mechanisms. The 2007 criteria for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), sometimes called the Frascati criteria, can falsely classify over 20% of cognitively healthy individuals as having cognitive impairment. Minimum criteria for HAND are met on the basis of performance on cognitive tests alone, which might not be appropriate for populations with diverse educational and socioeconomic backgrounds. Imprecise phenotyping of cognitive impairment can limit mechanistic research, biomarker discovery and treatment trials. Importantly, overestimation of cognitive impairment carries the risk of creating fear among people living with HIV and worsening stigma and discrimination towards these individuals. To address this issue, we established the International HIV-Cognition Working Group, which is globally representative and involves the community of people living with HIV. We reached consensus on six recommendations towards a new approach for diagnosis and classification of cognitive impairment in people living with HIV, intended to focus discussion and debate going forward. We propose the conceptual separation of HIV-associated brain injury - including active or pretreatment legacy damage - from other causes of brain injury occurring in people living with HIV. We suggest moving away from a quantitative neuropsychological approach towards an emphasis on clinical context. Our recommendations are intended to better represent the changing profile of cognitive impairment in people living with HIV in diverse global settings and to provide a clearer framework of classification for clinical management and research studies.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionHIV InfectionsHIVHumansNeurocognitive DisordersNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID37311873
OpenAlexW4380434193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.