Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37311808›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Natural history of long-COVID in a nationwide, population cohort study.

Claire E Hastie, David J Lowe, Andrew McAuley, Nicholas L Mills, Andrew J Winter, Corri Black, Janet T Scott, Catherine A O'Donnell, David N Blane, Susan Browne and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Long COVID in healthcare workers: longitudinal mixed-methods study.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Chronic autonomic symptom burden in long-COVID: a follow-up cohort study.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Claire E HastieSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow G12 8TB, Glasgow, UK.
David J LoweSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow G12 8TB, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4866-2049
Andrew McAuleyPublic Health Scotland, Meridian Court, Glasgow, G2 6QQ, UK.
Nicholas L MillsBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0533-7991
Andrew J WinterSandyford Sexual Health Services, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, G3 7NB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8293-9462
Corri BlackAberdeen Centre for Health Data Science, University of Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Aberdeen, UK.
Janet T ScottMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK.
Catherine A O'DonnellSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow G12 8TB, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5368-3779
David N BlaneSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow G12 8TB, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3872-3621
Susan BrowneSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow G12 8TB, Glasgow, UK.
Tracy R IbbotsonSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow G12 8TB, Glasgow, UK.
Jill P PellSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow G12 8TB, Glasgow, UK. Jill.pell@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8898-7035

Funding

Chief Scientist Office COV/LTE/20/06Medical Research Council MC_PC_20029Medical Research Council MC_UU_00034/6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies on the natural history of long-COVID have been few and selective. Without comparison groups, disease progression cannot be differentiated from symptoms originating from other causes. The Long-COVID in Scotland Study (Long-CISS) is a Scotland-wide, general population cohort of adults who had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection matched to PCR-negative adults. Serial, self-completed, online questionnaires collected information on pre-existing health conditions and current health six, 12 and 18 months after index test. Of those with previous symptomatic infection, 35% reported persistent incomplete/no recovery, 12% improvement and 12% deterioration. At six and 12 months, one or more symptom was reported by 71.5% and 70.7% respectively of those previously infected, compared with 53.5% and 56.5% of those never infected. Altered taste, smell and confusion improved over time compared to the never infected group and adjusted for confounders. Conversely, late onset dry and productive cough, and hearing problems were more likely following SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19DeafnessAdultCohort StudiesHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37311808
PMCPMC10263377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.