Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37311801›Full record

ArticleISME communications2023

Future ocean conditions induce necrosis, microbial dysbiosis and nutrient cycling imbalance in the reef sponge Stylissa flabelliformis.

Emmanuelle S Botté, Holly Bennett, J Pamela Engelberts, Torsten Thomas, James J Bell, Nicole S Webster, Heidi M Luter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microbiome changes in the spongeFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Mass mortality of the keratose spongeFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmanuelle S BottéCentre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. e.botte@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-5891
Holly BennettAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7954-8006
J Pamela EngelbertsAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Torsten ThomasCentre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-3001
James J BellVictoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9996-945X
Nicole S WebsterAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Heidi M LuterAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland, Australia. h.luter@aims.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7810-7076
Australian Institute of Marine Science · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUNSW Sydney · AUVictoria University of Wellington · NZ

Funding

Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) Appropriation fundAustralian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) Appropriation fundingFaculty of Science, Victoria University of Wellington (Faculty of Science, VUW) VUW1505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oceans are rapidly warming and acidifying in the context of climate change, threatening sensitive marine biota including coral reef sponges. Ocean warming (OW) and ocean acidification (OA) can impact host health and associated microbiome, but few studies have investigated these effects, which are generally studied in isolation, on a specific component of the holobiont. Here we present a comprehensive view of the consequences of simultaneous OW and OA for the tropical sponge Stylissa flabelliformis. We found no interactive effect on the host health or microbiome. Furthermore, OA (pH 7.6 versus pH 8.0) had no impact, while OW (31.5 °C versus 28.5 °C) caused tissue necrosis, as well as dysbiosis and shifts in microbial functions in healthy tissue of necrotic sponges. Major taxonomic shifts included a complete loss of archaea, reduced proportions of Gammaproteobacteria and elevated relative abundances of Alphaproteobacteria. OW weakened sponge-microbe interactions, with a reduced capacity for nutrient exchange and phagocytosis evasion, indicating lower representations of stable symbionts. The potential for microbially-driven nitrogen and sulphur cycling was reduced, as was amino acid metabolism. Crucially, the dysbiosis annihilated the potential for ammonia detoxification, possibly leading to accumulation of toxic ammonia, nutrient imbalance, and host tissue necrosis. Putative defence against reactive oxygen species was greater at 31.5 °C, perhaps as microorganisms capable of resisting temperature-driven oxidative stress were favoured. We conclude that healthy symbiosis in S. flabelliformis is unlikely to be disrupted by future OA but will be deeply impacted by temperatures predicted for 2100 under a "business-as-usual" carbon emission scenario.

Identifiers

PMID37311801
PMCPMC10264452
OpenAlexW4380538357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.