SynthesisScientific reports2023
Reference-based cell type matching of in situ image-based spatial transcriptomics data on primary visual cortex of mouse brain.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- ModelistsGCN: a multimodal graph convolutional network framework for single-cell spatial transcriptomic cell typing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Thyroid hormone regulatory system in the mouse retina: integrated transcriptional and translational analysis of deiodinase enzymes, thyroid hormone receptors and thyroid hormone transporters.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- The ANTsX ecosystem for mapping the mouse brain.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Review
- High-resolution mapping of single cells in spatial context.Nature communications · 2025Article
- STCC enhances spatial domain detection through consensus clustering of spatial transcriptomics data.Genome research · 2025Article
- Modular strategies for spatial mapping of diverse cell type data of the mouse brain.Research square · 2025Article
- Optimizing Xenium In Situ data utility by quality assessment and best-practice analysis workflows.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Homebuilt Imaging-Based Spatial Transcriptomics: Tertiary Lymphoid Structures as a Case Example.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Spatial transcriptomics in health and disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2024Review
- Challenges and best practices in omics benchmarking.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Discovery of optimal cell type classification marker genes from single cell RNA sequencing data.BMC methods · 2024Article
- SpaceWalker enables interactive gradient exploration for spatial transcriptomics data.Cell reports methods · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the advent of multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and in situ RNA sequencing technologies, spatial transcriptomics analysis is advancing rapidly, providing spatial location and gene expression information about cells in tissue sections at single cell resolution. Cell type classification of these spatially-resolved cells can be inferred by matching the spatial transcriptomics data to reference atlases derived from single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) in which cell types are defined by differences in their gene expression profiles. However, robust cell type matching of the spatially-resolved cells to reference scRNA-seq atlases is challenging due to the intrinsic differences in resolution between the spatial and scRNA-seq data. In this study, we systematically evaluated six computational algorithms for cell type matching across four image-based spatial transcriptomics experimental protocols (MERFISH, smFISH, BaristaSeq, and ExSeq) conducted on the same mouse primary visual cortex (VISp) brain region. We find that many cells are assigned as the same type by multiple cell type matching algorithms and are present in spatial patterns previously reported from scRNA-seq studies in VISp. Furthermore, by combining the results of individual matching strategies into consensus cell type assignments, we see even greater alignment with biological expectations. We present two ensemble meta-analysis strategies used in this study and share the consensus cell type matching results in the Cytosplore Viewer ( https://viewer.cytosplore.org ) for interactive visualization and data exploration. The consensus matching can also guide spatial data analysis using SSAM, allowing segmentation-free cell type assignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.