Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37311748›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Parieto-occipital ERP indicators of gut mechanosensation in humans.

Ahmad Mayeli, Obada Al Zoubi, Evan J White, Sheridan Chappelle, Rayus Kuplicki, Alexa Morton, Jaimee Bruce, Ryan Smith, Justin S Feinstein, Jerzy Bodurka and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The Mind From Within: Visceral Roots of Human Cognition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Altered Gastrointestinal Interoception in Anorexia Nervosa Predicts Relapse.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Interoception in pregnancy: Implications for peripartum depression.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ahmad Mayeli *Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2084-5559
Obada Al Zoubi *Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Evan J WhiteLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Sheridan ChappelleLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Rayus KuplickiLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2954-6421
Alexa MortonLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Jaimee BruceLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Ryan SmithLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4448-185X
Justin S FeinsteinLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Jerzy BodurkaLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Martin P PaulusLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0825-3606
Sahib S KhalsaLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA. skhalsa@laureateinstitute.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2124-8585

Funding

A neurocomputational assay of gastrointestinal interoception in anorexia nervosaR01MH127225 · NIMH · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI KHALSA, SAHIB S., PAULUS, MARTIN P. · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH127225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the neural processes governing the human gut-brain connection has been challenging due to the inaccessibility of the body's interior. Here, we investigated neural responses to gastrointestinal sensation using a minimally invasive mechanosensory probe by quantifying brain, stomach, and perceptual responses following the ingestion of a vibrating capsule. Participants successfully perceived capsule stimulation under two vibration conditions (normal and enhanced), as evidenced by above chance accuracy scores. Perceptual accuracy improved significantly during the enhanced relative to normal stimulation, which was associated with faster stimulation detection and reduced reaction time variability. Capsule stimulation induced late neural responses in parieto-occipital electrodes near the midline. Moreover, these 'gastric evoked potentials' showed intensity-dependent increases in amplitude and were significantly correlated with perceptual accuracy. Our results replicated in a separate experiment, and abdominal X-ray imaging localized most capsule stimulations to the gastroduodenal segments. Combined with our prior observation that a Bayesian model is capable of estimating computational parameters of gut-brain mechanosensation, these findings highlight a unique form of enterically-focused sensory monitoring within the human brain, with implications for understanding gut feelings and gut-brain interactions in healthy and clinical populations.

Indexed as

BrainEmotionsBayes TheoremElectrodesHealth StatusHumans

Identifiers

PMID37311748
PMCPMC10264354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.