Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37311634›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

What follow-up interventions, programmes and pathways exist for minor stroke survivors after discharge from the acute setting? A scoping review.

Jennifer Crow, Matthew Savage, Lisa Gardner, Catherine Hughes, Ceile Corbett, Mary Wells, Paresh Malhotra

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer CrowDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK jcrow@ic.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4692-1799
Matthew SavageDepartment of Physiotherapy, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Lisa GardnerLibrary and Evidence Services, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Catherine HughesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ceile CorbettDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Mary WellsDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5789-2773
Paresh MalhotraDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR 300359Department of Health NIHR302124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the breadth and range of follow-up interventions currently provided to people after minor stroke with a focus on the definitions used for minor stroke, intervention components, intervention theory and outcomes used. These findings will inform the development and feasibility testing of a pathway of care.

designScoping review. SEARCH STRATEGY: The final search was run in January 2022. Five databases were searched-EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, British Nursing Index and PsycINFO. Grey literature was also searched. Title and abstract screening and full-text reviews were conducted by two researchers and a third was involved when differences of opinion existed. A bespoke data extraction template was created, refined and then completed. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist was used to describe interventions.

resultsTwenty-five studies, using a range of research methodologies were included in the review. A range of definitions were used for minor stroke. Interventions focused largely on secondary prevention and management of increased risk of further stroke. Fewer focused on the management of hidden impairments experienced after minor stroke. Limited family involvement was reported and collaboration between secondary and primary care was seldom described. The intervention components, content, duration and delivery were varied as were the outcome measures used.

conclusionThere is an increasing volume of research exploring how best to provide follow-up care to people after minor stroke. Personalised, holistic and theory-informed interdisciplinary follow-up is needed that balances education and support needs with adjustment to life after stroke.

Indexed as

Body FluidsStrokeChecklistFollow-Up StudiesHumansPatient Dischargeorganisation of health servicespreventive medicinerehabilitation medicinestroke

Identifiers

PMID37311634
PMCPMC10277077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.