Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37311398›Full record

ArticleClinical imaging2023

A role for breast ultrasound Artificial Intelligence decision support in the evaluation of small invasive lobular carcinomas.

Tali Amir, Kristen Coffey, Varadan Sevilimedu, Reza Fardanesh, Victoria L Mango

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tali AmirDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States of America. Electronic address: amirt@mskcc.org.
Kristen CoffeyDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States of America. Electronic address: coffeyk@mskcc.org.
Varadan SevilimeduDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave, 2nd floor, New York, NY 10017, United States of America. Electronic address: sevilims@mskcc.org.
Reza FardaneshDepartment of Radiology, University of California Los Angeles, 1250 16th St, Suite 2340, Santa Monica, CA 90404, United States of America. Electronic address: rfardanesh@metnet.UCLA.edu.
Victoria L MangoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States of America. Electronic address: mangov@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) decision support (DS) system in the ultrasound (US) assessment of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast, a cancer that can demonstrate variable appearance and present insidiously.

methodsRetrospective review was performed of 75 patients with 83 ILC diagnosed by core biopsy or surgery between November 2017 and November 2019. ILC characteristics (size, shape, echogenicity) were recorded. AI DS output (lesion characteristics, likelihood of malignancy) was compared to radiologist assessment.

resultsThe AI DS system interpreted 100% of ILCs as suspicious or probably malignant (100% sensitivity, and 0% false negative rate). 99% (82/83) of detected ILCs were initially recommended for biopsy by the interpreting breast radiologist, and 100% (83/83) were recommended for biopsy after one additional ILC was identified on same-day repeat diagnostic ultrasound. For lesions in which the AI DS output was probably malignant, but assigned a BI-RADS 4 assessment by the radiologist, the median lesion size was 1 cm, compared with a median lesion size of 1.4 cm for those given a BI-RADS 5 assessment (p = 0.006). These results suggest that AI may offer more useful DS in smaller sub-centimeter lesions in which shape, margin status, or vascularity is more difficult to discern. Only 20% of patients with ILC were assigned a BI-RADS 5 assessment by the radiologist.

conclusionThe AI DS accurately characterized 100% of detected ILC lesions as suspicious or probably malignant. AI DS may be helpful in increasing radiologist confidence when assessing ILC on ultrasound.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, LobularArtificial IntelligenceBreastFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, MammaryArtificial IntelligenceBreast cancerBreast ultrasoundDecision supportInvasive lobular carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37311398
PMCPMC10860082
OpenAlexW4376866219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.