Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37311121›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2023

The TeleTriageTeam, Offering Continuity of Personalized Care Through Telemedicine: Development and Evaluation.

Janneau Claessens, Sigrid Mueller-Schotte, Jeannette van Weerden, Helianthe Kort, Saskia Imhof, Robert Wisse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janneau ClaessensDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9586-9080
Sigrid Mueller-SchotteDepartment of Optometry and Orthoptics, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1843-1469
Jeannette van WeerdenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4910-4218
Helianthe KortResearch group Technologies for Healthcare Innovations, Research Centre Sustainable and Healthy Living, HU University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9735-1015
Saskia ImhofDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9332-0377
Robert WisseDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2844-9868

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic taught us how to rethink care delivery. It catalyzed creative solutions to amplify the potential of personnel and facilities. This paper presents and evaluates a promptly introduced triaging solution that evolved into a tool to tackle the ever-growing waiting lists at an academic ophthalmology department, the TeleTriageTeam (TTT). A team of undergraduate optometry students, tutor optometrists, and ophthalmologists collaborate to maintain continuity of eye care. In this ongoing project, we combine innovative interprofessional task allocation, teaching, and remote care delivery.

objectiveIn this paper, we described a novel approach, the TTT; reported its clinical effectiveness and impact on waiting lists; and discussed its transformation to a sustainable method for delivering remote eye care.

methodsReal-world clinical data of all patients assessed by the TTT between April 16, 2020, and December 31, 2021, are covered in this paper. Business data on waiting lists and patient portal access were collected from the capacity management team and IT department of our hospital. Interim analyses were performed at different time points during the project, and this study presents a synthesis of these analyses.

resultsA total of 3658 cases were assessed by the TTT. For approximately half (1789/3658, 48.91%) of the assessed cases, an alternative to a conventional face-to-face consultation was found. The waiting lists that had built up during the first months of the pandemic diminished and have been stable since the end of 2020, even during periods of imposed lockdown restrictions and reduced capacity. Patient portal access decreased with age, and patients who were invited to perform a remote, web-based eye test at home were on average younger than patients who were not invited.

conclusionsOur promptly introduced approach to remotely review cases and prioritize urgency has been successful in maintaining continuity of care and education throughout the pandemic and has evolved into a telemedicine service that is of great interest for future purposes, especially in the routine follow-up of patients with chronic diseases. TTT appears to be a potentially preferred practice in other clinics and medical specialties. The paradox is that judicious clinical decision-making based on remotely collected data is possible, only if we as caregivers are willing to change our routines and cognitions regarding face-to-face care delivery.

Indexed as

COVID-19eye caremobile phoneophthalmologyremote caretelehealthtelemedicinetriaging

Identifiers

PMID37311121
PMCPMC10389250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.