Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37311118›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2023

Challenges in using patient involvement principles in substance use treatment.

Njål Herman Eikeng Sterri, Jan H Rosenvinge, Gunn Pettersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Njål Herman Eikeng SterriDepartment of Health and Care Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Jan H RosenvingeDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Gunn PettersenDepartment of Health and Care Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth professionals are responsible for implementing patient involvement (PI) in the choice of treatment approach. Previous studies within the field of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment have shown positive patient experiences with PI. However, little is known about challenges experienced by health professionals in converting principles of PI into clinical practice.

aimsTo explore challenges with PI in the treatment of SUD.

methodFive health professionals working in a Norwegian institution for inpatient treatment of SUD were included and took part in a semi-structured interview. Data were analysed using a systematic text condensation approach.

resultsPI in SUD was perceived as challenging due to conceptual unclarities as well as treatment dilemmas that may challenge the notion of PI as a universal and unified ideological foundation of substance use treatment.

conclusionsThe findings point to a need to critically examine the PI concept and to take a flexible approach in adjusting PI principles to good clinical practice. A framework is launched, allowing the reported challenges in implementing PI in clinical practice to be accepted, acknowledged, and recognized by clinicians as well as by administrators and heads of clinical units.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelPatient ParticipationHealth FacilitiesHealth PersonnelHospitalizationHumansExperiencesPatient involvementQualitative ResearchSubstance use disorderSubstance use treatment

Identifiers

PMID37311118
PMCPMC10266110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.