Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37310955›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli at the human-animal-environment interface in a farming community of central Uganda.

James Muleme, David Musoke, Bonny E Balugaba, Stevens Kisaka, Frederick E Makumbi, Esther Buregyeya, John Bosco Isunju, Rogers Wambi, Richard K Mugambe, Clovice Kankya and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antimicrobial-resistantmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

James MulemeDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8967-7031
David MusokeDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Bonny E BalugabaDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1291-5561
Stevens KisakaDepartment of Biosecurity Ecosystems and Veterinary Public Health, Makerere University College of Veterinary Medicine Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Kampala, Uganda.
Frederick E MakumbiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Esther BuregyeyaDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
John Bosco IsunjuDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7396-7851
Rogers WambiDepartment of Biosecurity Ecosystems and Veterinary Public Health, Makerere University College of Veterinary Medicine Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1792-0412
Richard K MugambeDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2311-5436
Clovice KankyaDepartment of Biosecurity Ecosystems and Veterinary Public Health, Makerere University College of Veterinary Medicine Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6982-912X
Musso MunyemeDepartment of Disease Control, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7224-1071
John C SsempebwaDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec) represents a significant global public health concern. The epidemiology of ESBL-Ec in Uganda is not well understood although it is harbored by humans, animals, and the environment. This study explains the epidemiology of ESBL-Ec using a one health approach in selected farming households in Wakiso district, Uganda. METHODOLOGY: Environmental, human, and animal samples were collected from 104 households. Additional data were obtained using observation checklists and through interviews with household members using a semi-structured questionnaire. Surface swabs, soil, water, human and animal fecal samples were introduced onto ESBL chromogenic agar. The isolates were identified using biochemical tests and double-disk synergy tests. To assess associations, prevalence ratios (PRs) were computed using a generalized linear model (GLM) analysis with modified Poisson and a log link with robust standard errors in R software.

resultsApproximately 83% (86/104) households had at least one positive ESBL-Ec isolate. The overall prevalence of ESBL-Ec at the human-animal-environment interface was approximately 25.0% (95% CI: 22.7-28.3). Specifically, humans, animals and the environment had an ESBL-Ec prevalence of 35.4%, 55.4%, and 9.2% respectively. Having visitors (adj PR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04-1.36), utilizing veterinary services (adj PR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.20-1.61) and using animal waste for gardening (adj PR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05-1.60) were positively associated with household ESBL-Ec contamination. Covering the drinking water container with a lid (adj PR = 0.84 95% CI: 0.73-0.96) was associated with absence of ESBL-Ec in a household.

conclusionThere is wider dissemination of ESBL-Ec in the environment, humans, and animals, indicating poor infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in the area. Improved collaborative one health mitigation strategies such as safe water chain, farm biosecurity, household and facility-based IPC measures are recommended to reduce the burden of antimicrobial resistance at community level.

Identifiers

PMID37310955
PMCPMC10270331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.